Minced children? Is that what you scousers put in your pies?

Nah. It's all on tinernet.

No, it's not. It really is in your head. Which since you think you can advise a multi-championship winning captain on how to mentally approach a playoff game, I think it needs examining pretty urgently. I'd get it checked quickly, before the Tories get rid of the NHS and you're doomed to live the rest of your life in an inner world of total tedry.

That's were i have been going wrong i should have minced my children i would have saved a fortune not having to bring them up i wonder what they taste like

Quote: Deano G "So that's what the Leeds captain is thinking. Lockers will let his rugby do the talking. '" Yeah, about that.... www.wiganwarriors.com/WContent.a ... 579&type=1

Quote: Deano G "So that's what the Leeds captain is thinking. Lockers will let his rugby do the talking. '" Yeah, about that.... www.wiganwarriors.com/WContent.a ... 579&type=1

What's even more remarkable is that the comment has come "shirley" who very rarely tackles below the neck anyway.
Why are they doing this media frontage are they all locked into the Wane bully bubble.

In fairness to O'Loughlin his comments are more reasonable than most others I've read this week. I don't agree with his opinion on either ban but it does come across as a fair-handed opinion, rather than a cheap attempt to get a player banned or a slightly less cheap attempt to help a player avoid a ban.

Whilst this desciptin of events could well be true and paints a different scene than the one of Wane jumping on the microphone to demand his opposition players are banned, don't we remeber the day when a coach would have said something like
"We're concentrating on our own game, not on Danny McGuire."
?

"I dont think Danny should have faced any games - just like Micky shouldnt have faced any games. But once The RFL have gone down that avenue like with Micky, they have set a precedent."

He remains firmly on-message, in that the myth being peddled is that both players committed identical offences, when any fair-minded and vaguely sentient person can see that they didn't.

Hey ho - to use a few Stevoisms, it should be a 'humdinger' or indeed, a 'wow of a game.'

What myth? All that's being said is that neither player should have faced a ban, there's no hint of the same or even similar offences.

Just like the myth's that can be read in the last week about Wigan, on this very page there's the myth of Sean O' not tackling below the neck for example.

Can Burrow actually play the ball without crawling forward out of the tackle?

i hope the wait was worth it.