and apparently saints had 9 first grade players missing, but i don't think it was mentioned ?

Well at least you covered it twice so no one else missed it.

Besides we were taking on the 2014 GF winners.

The thing that annoys me the most is if there's an error or penalty and they'll replay it a couple of times and then still be talking about it 5 or 10 minutes later if a try has been scored. That's what I like about the NRL viewing, they just get on with it.

The only annoying aspect with the multiple replays IMO is that they have started to miss things in games that are happening (such as penalty kicks not reaching touch or the ball being lost on the first play or somebody breaking the line) due to showing excessive and often pointless replays. They have missed such incidents this season showing replays of pointless things like players talking to teammates, or by showing a 5th or 6th replay of the same minor incident like a knock on at the PTB.

If they want to analyse individual incidents at length then let Jon Wells do it at HT/FT when nothing of the game will be missed. That's what they have so many pundits for anyway.

And then they show a replay of what they missed while showing the previous replay. STOP IT!!!

Fox Sports have some replays displayed in a small box in the right corner, then live action isn't missed. If there is a stoppage or try, then of course they go full screen.

Channel 9 just does full screen replays, they don't miss live action though.

Sky stop trying to create controversy at every opportunity.

As for replays during the action, they should copy what Fox do in Aus, and have a little box in the corner of the screen. Sky and Fox are the same company, I can't see why their production should be so different. Ok, it's not all that different, but it is a little different.

They create false controversy.

Wasn't that a knock on? did he play at it? but wasn't it a high shot anyway? i think he's got that wrong, surely he was offside?

Every single little thing, throughout the game. It's exhausting.

This.

A try is scored and the first replay will often be the incident that led to a penalty 70 yards back up the field, or the knock on that turned over possession 5 tackles ago. They dwell on the negatives rather than highlighting the good play. A combination of too many replays, and the wrong sort of replay. I find NRL coverage much less frustrating on this front - they tend to only replay really key incidents.

It does get annoying.I just wish they would call the game as it unfolds at bit more instead of constantly combing over every little decision or non decision, and going on and on about it.

Oh, and Cummings is a waste of air time too.

As above. Fans at a game might boo an iffy decision but tend to forget it almost immediately - unless a try results. Sky's constant nit picking and harping on by the "experts" really doesn't fit with how I wish the game to be screened.

Bizzare decisions tonight, and again taking forever to make a decision and often the wrong one, the shoulder charge one a real joke IMO.If i was Sandercock i would be fuming.

I agree, shoulder charge my harris. He braced himself for the impact thats it.

Rovers are getting hammered by the video ref