Quote: enigmatic "When SL was set up Paris and London should have received twice the cash of the other 10 teams. Each SL side should have received 7% with the 2 expansion clubs getting 14%. I have no doubt that the owners of the other 10 clubs would have preferred 7% of something to what they were currently receiving and if any of them didn't fancy it, they could always remain part time and living hand to mouth. If the current budget for 12 SL clubs is 18 million, this would mean 10 clubs getting 1,286 million each and 2 expansion clubs getting 2.6 million. It wouldn't be very fair in the eyes of the heartland supporters of a few teams and therefore, you have a 12 team SL camped predominantly along 1 motorway with a sole outpost in the south of France packed with Australians and of no assistance to French RL as a whole.
This is why the NRL have come to the rescue of the Titans, as they did before at the Knights. The "reach" or perceived "reach" is what keeps advertisers and sponsors happy. A quick glance at the siting of the 11 english top flight teams in SL points to where we are going wrong....'"
I agree with you about differential payments to expansion clubs, though I don't think double the amount of heartland clubs would get accepted by the heartland clubs. But certainly the RFL should have been supporting London financially last year to give them a chance to stay in Super League.
If we didn't have London in Super League all those years we would never have developed Dan Sarginson, Tony Clubb, Louis McCarthy-Scarsbrook, Kieran Dixon and many others playing at a professional level in Super League. If London stays in the Championship for a long time, we may not see similar quality players emerging from southern England again.
Nigel Wood and his cronies appear to be clueless about the needs of the game.