Too few games... Over the years it has has conistently been the view of club chairmen that they need at least 12 (but preferably 14) home games per regular season to make ends meet. 9 guaranteed home games just won't be enough unless other revenue sources take up the slack. And, as the TV money will be required to also fund the lower competitions, there won't be much of that to spare.

Central funding from the RFL to all clubs coming from the revenue off of international fixtures. Also split the money from Magic Weekend & OTR fixtures 50-50. So that's at least 10 home games on average.

And TV money would be thicker spread across fewer teams.

I don't agree with a 10 team league, there aren't enough games. Clubs will struggle with their stadium only being used 9 times a season. I like the idea of an "on the road" round though, as long as it's done sensibly.

I'd doSuper League
- 12 teams
- 5 year licence
- Much more in-depth and transparent club evaluations with grades given for various areas of the club (finances, playing strength, facilities etc) along with in-depth reasons for the grades and targets to be met by the end of the licence period. If targets not met then a proportion of TV money withheld if club not relegated at end of licence period.
- 22 regular games
- Magic Weekend
- "on the road" round
- SL clubs put into the Cup a round earlier
- Top 6 playoffs
- only teams finishing 12th each year eligible for relegation plus clubs that go into administration
- SL players chosen in an Elite Training Squad at start of season to play a max of 24 domestic games in the season (not including WCC or Playoffs)
- Non-Fed Trained quota reduced to 3
- Current salary cap limit, with a max of 2 players allowed "off quota".

Championship
- 14 teams
- P&R with league below
- 26 regular games
- Top 6 playoffs
- Only winner of Grand Final each year eligible for promotion at next licence period
- Dual Reg available to those clubs that want it
- SL club that has Dual Reg partnership agreement must make available at least 1 home SL game as a double header with Championship club and provide Championship club a significant share of the gate income.
- More compensation to Championship clubs that develop players who go to SL clubs, a higher amount if they're in a club that win a trophy, and a higher amount if they go on to represent England/GB.


Championship One
- 12 teams
- P&R with Championship. 2 up, 2 down. League Leader and Playoff winner.
- 22 regular games
- 2nd to 6th playoffs

Challenge Cup
- SL clubs entered a round earlier
- when playing Championship clubs, SL clubs must abide by Championship quota limits
- Amateur games stopped for CC semis and finals
- all clubs including amateur to be given a cut of any tickets they sell for semis and final
- RFL to help clubs get discounted coach travel for semis and final

World Club Challenge
- a 2 tier comp
- World Club Challenge, as now, SL GF winner v NRL GF winner
- World Club Plate (better name needed) 4 team comp - Challenge Cup winner v NRL runner up, next highest placed SL v next highest placed NRL

Money distribution
- higher proportion to Championshio clubs, with some set aside as a separate marketing budget specifically for Championship.

We need to increase the player pool two tens does that
Folk say that the pt clubs don't offer anything yet Chris hill was outstanding on Saturday raised by Leigh yet not a kr fc London Widnes raised player in sight
Cut the carp two tens 27 fixtures and a 5 team play off

How does 2 ten team leagues increase the player pool?

So what income is it that supports these lower leagues?

In the current scheme the RFL idea seems to be that this would largely be the TV revenue from the teams dropped from SL (i.e. no increased share for the remaining teams!)

I know people are getting swept away with how brilliant the World Cup has been so far, but as it stands a mid-season break for an international competition would be pointless. England would still walk it. Also the NRL based players that have made themselves available for the World Cup would definitely not be playing in a mid-season comp. It would just appear that we were trying to copy RU.

I think any European international competition should involve the England Knights rather than the first team. But any talk of a mid-season break for internationals is a complete non-starter.

Wrong.

Rugby League needs a pyramid structure whereby any club can see a route to the top (as with Soccer in this country). For example, during the successful World Cup match in Bristol last night we heard about the fantastic development of the Bristol Sonics club over the last five years. The people involved there need to see that if they continue to do everything right successive promotions could see them reach Super League in the [inext[/i five years.

As regards the top of structure, the 2 leagues of 12 (Super League 1 and Super League 2) splitting into 3 8's at the business end of the season is something that should be adopted and retained long term. Note that most people think that the middle eight will result in the 4 that came down from SL 1 ending up at the top - so that it will be the same 12 teams that start in SL1 the next season - with effectively no-one promoted. But that's not the point - there is the PROSPECT of promotion through to the top - if earned on the field. And that is what will allow Rugby League to grow and prosper at every level in the pyramid.

Rugby league had a pyramid structure for over 30 years. It didn’t grow and prosper. It offered clubs the opportunity to grow from the grass-roots up. The success of that totalled the London Skolars in the entire history of the game.

We have tried what you have said. It is a proven failure.

RU has spent the last 20 years copying RL - they've done fine.

I think that may be true, but if you look at my other thread I did suggest allowing players eligible for European Nations an exemption from the NFT Cap. So Keith Galloway, Peter Wallace, James McManus, Anthony Minichiello et al could all come over to SL.

I'd also allow clubs to have two 'Designated Player' spots, where the club chairman is directly liable for their renumeration and not the club, and where there is no salary cap limit. This would allow the biggest clubs to try and pull off the headline-grabbing signings UK RL needs. Would love to see Koukash dip into his pockets personally to bring SBW to Salford.

Any competition with the Knights will be treated as it deserves. As a 2nd tier tournament with limited interest. The Aussie based players wouldn’t play if there wasn’t a mid-season break. Next to nobody would play for the other nations if they are put in a competition with Englands reserves.

If there is one thing this tournament should teach us its than when the nations outside of England, Australia and NZ are treated with respect, treated as equals and given time to plan and build towards a tournament they are capable of performing on and off the pitch, showing the game in its best light.

Time and time again international sides are denigrated in their quality and the pride they show in their shirt. Time and time again when we treat them with respect they pay it back ten-fold.

Nobody can watch the American side celebrate yesterday and tell me it meant nothing to them. Nobody can watch that Samoan performance a few days ago and say that these were just a bunch of kiwi rejects and not a soul on this earth could watch the Fiji national side singing a hymn in a Rochdale church, or listen to Mike Ratu talk about his pride in seeing 3 generations of his family play for Rochdale and then be able to bring his national side there and credibly argue that what they are doing is any less important or worthy than what England or Australia are doing. International sport is the future of our game. It always has been and all these nations with all their idiosyncrasies are just as much part of that narrative as England, Australia and NZ.

The old days where there was automatically 4 up 4 down every season was a mistake. That mistake has been learned. The new 2 x 12 / 3 x 8 will be fantastic for the game once it is introduced and beds down over the years. As I said, unlike the old days of automatic 4 up, 4 down, the new structure [icould[/i mean there is in practice nobody promoted or relegated for years - but that's not the point.

Beds down over the years! Oh you do make us LAFF!

500 FT players as opposed to 350, seems like an increase to me

if you have 350 pro players and 150 part time players, and you make those 500 ft players you havent increased The player pool at all. You have just paid some a bit more. The increase in the player pool comes from the very very bottom. We could have a professional team representing all 11k parishes in the UK (and im sure some would see that as ideal) but if we don’t increase the number of players at youth level graduating through every level up to pro our player pool doesn’t increase at all.

Our player pool isnt the number of pro-players we have, it’s the number of players we have to pick pro-players from.