Absoloutly disgraceful decision by the video refs . Safe to to say they want saints to make the top 4

Can't see anyway they could have given that. Makes a farce of the VR system

Utter bullsh|t.

If the on-field ref makes that decision then ok. The video ref shouldn't get that wrong.

It's nowhere near good enough and makes a mockery of the game.

How that can be allowed but the Leeds try v Wigan is disallowed shows everything anyone needs to know about our refereeing system and the people in charge of it.

Whaaaat! I wanna hear VR expalanation for that one.Cas screwed over.

Awful decision.

I've not watched a TV game for ages. I decided to watch tonight's game and now I've realised why I don't watch TV games anymore!!!! I have now turned over to something else.

The video ref is killing the game. My opinion is that it should be scrapped completely

It's not the system, it's the people operating it - they're either woefully under qualified to be officiating elite level sports or there's something sinister behind it.

Meanwhile, are any teams going to learn how to defend! Scores seem to be lots versus a bit more

Cummings is so annoying, he is there to clarify decisions and gets more wrong than even the VR!

awful decision, changed the game in saints favour!

you do have to question the integrity of the video referee at times!

Video referee is boring now. This game must be 15 minutes behind schedule!

It's this ridiculous idea to make the on field ref HAVE to send it upstairs as either a try/no try,

If he'd have sent it up as a no try then he'd more than likely given no try. Don't need to scrap the VR, scrap the on field decision nonsense.

I've never been against the VR but since the introduction of the on field decision it's become a farce. Pertaining to an earlier "did he/didn't he ground it" decision: If the ref sees the ball grounded he calls a try. If he send it upstairs he can't have seen it grounded or he'd have called a try. Yet he calls a try as he's sending it upstairs which the VR can only disprove with concrete evidence. The view is obscured by a player's foot ruling out concrete proof, and we already know the ref hasn't seen it grounded or he wouldn't have referred it. So neither ref nor video ref has seen it grounded but the VR is bound by the rules to award a try.

As for the obstruction call, that was a complete joke. He changed direction to collide with the defender. It wasn't a bad read, there was no physical way he could have avoided that collision and made the tackle.

Cas have been well and truly screwed. Lost by 4 points as well.

It's a regular occurrence of Cas being on the end of "dodgy" video refereeing decisions.

That's the 3rd game this year where there's been clearly wrong decisions that have outright had a massive impact on the game (Catalan early in the season, Huddersfield at Wheldon Road and tonight)