Wigan's Ian Lenaghan speaks about his hopes for change :- www.wigantoday.net/sport/wigan-w ... -1-5098595

Wigan's Ian Lenaghan speaks about his hopes for change :- www.wigantoday.net/sport/wigan-w ... -1-5098595

'...and the retention of London Broncos' catches my eye. Interesting.

Lenaghan's ties with the capital club are still strong. He has also got into bed with the Toulouse club. Oh dear.

???
The club he moved, renamed, then left on a whim; tieing progress up as he went by not getting rid of his share????????????????
Not that I'm bitter (Mr Branson!!)

And owing Hughsey £2 million quid

Lenaghan put plenty of ££££ into Quins when he was there.

Lenagan does want Toulouse in SL.
As far as the summit meeting is concerned, it would not surprise me to hear an announcement at the end informing us of the return of the Great Britain test team together with tour details.
After all it would detract from a situation where there was little or no progress on how to take Super League forward or a lack of improvements to the Challenge Cup or play offs.
We shall see!

It would appear, though, that getting rid of the Broncos is an option that at least some clubs would be prepared to see - straight swap with Toulouse, maybe?

There is no reason to revert to Great Britain.
Who, from outside England, would you wish to include in a GB team.

The more pressing issue is to decide the numbers for SL, which will be mighty interesting (especially if there iss to be any cut in numbers any time soon)

it will be very interesting to see which clubs he thinks are not good enough for Super League,if he wants a ten team league and Toulouse in the mix, that means dropping five teams, most people know what teams he would like to be demoted, if he and others who run the so called teams Super League cannot do with out, want to see the game go forward its time they stopped just thinking about them selves,

It'd mean you could have England (the Knights effectively), Scotland, Ireland and Wales as second tier nations and committing to the latter 3 wouldn't cost players a shot at one day playing in top tier internationals, without all the messing about we currently have. The World Cup remains an issue, admittedly.

(GB & I - I know. GB & I & S, potentially)

But that means you dismiss Scotland, Wales and Ireland as 2nd tier teams, nobody is going to choose to play for Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and those nations will never attract people to their sport by being 2nd tier nations only worthy of being a sparring partner.

I thought the reason the RFL got Sport England money , was we had to end the GB team and revert to the 4 National teams? As they would not fund a Multi national team.

If they develop and improve then they become first-tier nations, obviously. If I was playing for, for example, Scotland, I'd rather routinely be playing and competing with Wales/Ireland/France/Fiji than getting scuttleypooped by 80-0 by Australia.
If I progress as a player, I can still play for GB and perhaps only get beaten by 10 or 20 by the Kangaroos. Huzzah!
We have to deal with the World as it is - '2nd tier' is maybe impolitic though, I admit, how about 'developing nations'? that sounds progressive.

Who cares what Lennegan thinks-He is only one of many chairman.