...how each super league team is doing financially. Does anybody have directions to such information?

I would like to see how much money is being drawn from the RFL's coffers and pumped into the likes of Harliquins (formerly London Broncos) who I fear otherwise would be unlikely to survive.

You could check companies house for some information but not that.

And i do doubt that the RFL are sending money to prop the Quins up, just like i doubt they are doing so for Celtic. At the end of the day what club's need to do is look at their own setup instead of concentrating on the Quins/Celtic/Toulouse. I know some people were shocked at the financial results Widnes posted. But to me they are a sign that the chairman is doing what he promised.

First we get our set up right, Club shop, Training facilities, Offices, Backroom staff and our academy up to scratch. Then we can go forward as a club.

If every other team did the same in whichever way they could ( i understand that not every club has a chairman like we do ) then the Sport would be in a much stronger position.

All we need from the RFL is a level playing field. And sadly the way i see it that is the only thing we will never again have in this sport. But we should not blame Quins, Celtic or Toulouse for that.

Some people are strange.

I would be interested to see how the RFL donations are labelled in their financial statements.

My Suggestions:

'Miscellaneous Earnings'
'Brand Acknowledgements'
'Friendly Debt Balancers'

etc

I doubt whether any rugby league club is financially viable without its "donations" from the TV monies - in fact there are probably no sporting clubs in the UK that could exist in their current format without "donations" from their central organisations TV monies.

Then again, its a valid income source.

Understood, but is it fair that Celtic and Quins get a lot more than anyone else just because nobody cares about Rugby League where they are based?

You can of course prove that statement?

Wigans accounts for the period ending 30th November 2008 showed a profit after taxation of £444,381

He should have put "fact" after it

FACT

there is no proof because the RFL keeps the truth away from the public. It is fact though come on everybody knows it

So you're admitting you've made it up then, yes?

I've been hoodwinked again haven't i? Halifaxxxxx?

Its not difficult to decipher the facts from the clues given to us.
In this instance, the clubs in question are bailed our big time by the RFL