Because they had 14 players on the pitch for a period of time tonight aswel. Lets see how consistent the RFL are shall we.

10K? Cash, obviously

Go on...?

They'll get Steve O'Connor to pay it.

McGoldrick's try came during a short time where Bradford appeared to have 14 players on the field when Jacob Fairbank ran on whilst Nick Scruton was groggily making his way off the pitch, reminiscent of the recent incident which saw Salford receive a £10,000 fine.

Thats a little different to what you did red league. He was getting helped off the pitch!! You actually played with 14 men. Give it a rest.

Still 14 players on the pitch.

Which often happens briefly during player interchanges. Did 14 players take part in play like Salford? If the situation isn't the same why would the punishment be?

I await howls of derision directed toward the RFL from people who often don't understand what they're talking about.

It's a joke and a disgrace.

Bradford still should of waited for their player to go off before sending their sub on. Still 14 players on the pitch no matter how you look at it.

It's like someone being done for gbh for breaking someone's jaw and someone different knocking someone's teeth out they'd still be charged with gbh by the courts.

Lets see how two faced the RFL really are ay?

A temporary court house has been built by an unnamed developer last night near the Barton Aerodome. The hearing will be at 11am this morning. Judge Marwan will preside.

You're having a laugh aren't you? Faux disgust at a none event.

No because its totally different. You played with 14 players. Bradford played with 13 players while 1 player was hobbling off the pitch not attempting to get back in the line. Totally different circumstances. The ref should have stopped the game if he was not going to allow Bradford to sub Scruton off.

You have been moaning 10,000 is too much but now your saying Bradford should get the same fine. Its gotta work both ways, your past comments are now contridicting themselves.

If Bradford are fined 10k then fair enough but the circumstances are totally different.

I think Salfords Dr K will have to pay the fine, its obvious there is something wrong with the Salford Pitch that is causing the player count reoccuring problem.

If Bradford get fined for the ref not holding play while a player is hobbling off the pitch then it is a right joke.

1. Playing a set or 3 tackles with 14 men on the pitch.

2. Playing with 13 men in the line while 1 is hobbling off the field.

Major differences there I dont even know why you are stating Bradford should get fined for that. The RFL have took a backward step if they fine th Bulls.

You shouldn't be allowed to have 14 players on the field whilst the ball is in play full stop. Of course Bradford had an advantage, they should have been down to 12 men whilst the player left the field, or are you suggesting subs should be allowed to run on and take part before the substituted player has actually left the field? Pretty sure the rules are clear on this one. Of course the rfl won't hit them the same, that would require a punishment framework that was consistent!