Well it's now almost certain that the top 4 is already decided, the next four are just going through the motions, if it was a 6 team play off, teams from 10-5 would still have something to play for. Next 8 weeks are no pretty much pointless friendless untill top four semis. The quicker the super 8's si confined to history the better, it was a crap idea/gimmick and has been proved to be so.
Next rounds of games will be p*** poor attendences and p*** poor games. The super league clubs need to get next years for,at sorted asap.

But they keep telling us that every minute matters...

You're never going to get a system where every minute matters. Unless you chop the league down to six teams.

Tough! We should stop driving down standards to pander to mid-table sides. If the sides in 6th-8th don't have anything to play for, that's their own fault, and they certainly should not be within a chance of winning a championship!

Why should Wakefield (6th) and Hull (5th) have a chance of reaching the Grand Final?

The only place to point the blame at is those clubs for not winning enough games to still be in with a chance of finishing in the top 4.

There’s still 16 points to play for, it’s still mathematically possible anyone of the top 8 could finish top 4, if clubs choose to give up that fight, again is only their own fault.

Middle 8s more exciting than SL

Stupid, the rfl should wait to see what the points totals are like halfway through the year before deciding the playoff format, that way we wouldn't have this problem. But what can you expect when it's the rfl.

Would agree with the comments 5-8 not been good enough over the course of the season to warrant a tilt at the grand final however it's doesn't alter the fact that the super 8's are pointless. Sooner the format is changed the better.

So we should change the format during the season to give mediocre clubs like Wakey a shot at getting top four?

Should we go back to top eight playoffs where it was also equally pointless?

The point if them is to have enough fixtures to produce enough income so that clubs can survive.

The alternative would be a 16 team league but then a lot of games would be one sided.
Just try watching the game for the rugby itself instead of continuing the stereotype that a lot of RL fans are moaning old women.

(Apologies to any old women who are reading this thread that wasn't meant as a sexist comment)

The point is that 5th-6th-7th-8th are not good enough having lost half there games and are closer to the bottom placed club compared to the top placed club. Everyone was equal at round 1, clubs have had 6 months to put in a challenge, thats long enough to sort the wheat from the chaff,
They are lumbered with dead rubbers but they can still influence the top 4 final positions for the home advantage.

Some pathetic posts on here from, I suspect, fans of “big clubs”.
Clubs like Trinity aren’t in there to have a tilt at the play off final but if the season so far is anything to go by they might well influence which teams do get to OT. Perhaps that’s what the “big clubs” are scared of - losing points to crappy little Wakefield!!!

And with Catalans and Huddersfield hitting form, there could be some 'nuisance' teams in those 5, 6, 7, 8 spots.

Why not go the whole hog and just have four teams in superleague, if the rfl is doing its best to destroy Rugby league the kno**eads on here are doing far worse why not just enjoy the game and stop whining about it.