FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Licensing 2015-17?
135 posts in 10 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint
RankPostsTeam
Moderator12646
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33809_1522680904.png
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png

Moderator


Based on the last round, applications will be due later this year with any promoted team announced in about 12 months from now and confirmation of the others 4 months after that.

Given that the current model has lost so much credibility, we're surely looking at least at a reboot and very possibly the alternatives. Any ideas on when we might get an indication of what the plans are? It has to be pretty soon, I'd have thought.

RankPostsTeam
International Star1743No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2019Aug 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



There will not be a licensing period this time, I think it will be scrapped in time for the SL club Chairmen to come up with something else to vote on to keep them at the top table.

The problem is there is no credibility in the licensing process anymore, Bradford, Salford and their robust business plans going to pot. Castleford and their ground not materialising in the last 6 years when promised time and time again, same goes for Wakefield. In all fairness they should have been cast aside along time ago for not bringing their promises to fruition, that way the governing body can be seen to lay a level and fair platform for all. There would be no fans wanting any clubs to fail then for the small glimmer of hope that their team may just get in from the back of it.

For me the biggest issue is the SL chairmen being able to make it up as they go along. The rfl can obviously bring money into the game as shows with bradford and Salford, Perhaps this is the way forward with the governing Body actually setting out some rules and sticking to them, Be it at SL level, Championship level or whatever.

The dual registration is another good example of SL clubs trying to save money, IMO to the detrement to the game as a whole, It makes a mockery of championship clubs and their competition as has been widely publized in the sporting press. As harsh as it may sound, If a club cannot compete in that competition whether it be SL or CC then they should allow someone to replace them and have a go, Be that a french team, a welsh team, a london team, a traditional M62 corridor team, personally i dont care as long as they get a shot at the big time when they are doing everything asked of them.

RankPostsTeam
International Star594No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2014Apr 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Wakefield ground plans progressing nicely.
Get up to speed.

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12646
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33809_1522680904.png
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png

Moderator


Quote: Faxhali "There will not be a licensing period this time, I think it will be scrapped in time for the SL club Chairmen to come up with something else to vote on to keep them at the top table.

The problem is there is no credibility in the licensing process anymore, Bradford, Salford and their robust business plans going to pot. Castleford and their ground not materialising in the last 6 years when promised time and time again, same goes for Wakefield. In all fairness they should have been cast aside along time ago for not bringing their promises to fruition, that way the governing body can be seen to lay a level and fair platform for all. There would be no fans wanting any clubs to fail then for the small glimmer of hope that their team may just get in from the back of it.

For me the biggest issue is the SL chairmen being able to make it up as they go along. The rfl can obviously bring money into the game as shows with bradford and Salford, Perhaps this is the way forward with the governing Body actually setting out some rules and sticking to them, Be it at SL level, Championship level or whatever.

The dual registration is another good example of SL clubs trying to save money, IMO to the detrement to the game as a whole, It makes a mockery of championship clubs and their competition as has been widely publized in the sporting press. As harsh as it may sound, If a club cannot compete in that competition whether it be SL or CC then they should allow someone to replace them and have a go, Be that a french team, a welsh team, a london team, a traditional M62 corridor team, personally i dont care as long as they get a shot at the big time when they are doing everything asked of them.'"



I think whether they go for licensing-lite, full blown franchising, promotion and relegation, a re-election system, or whatever, they need to decide in the not too distant. Fair enough, you don't want them to rush and get it wrong, but I think there's a sense of drift now. Licensing looked kind of pretty (from a SL perspective at least) on paper, and I think it blowing up has thrown the RL's leaders quite badly. It is as if they can't quite bring themselves to admit that it has failed. While I appreciate doing so isn't easy, the sport really needs to think about a future which starts pretty soon. As time passes, options start to narrow.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach6809
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2023Jan 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
18302_1567366773.png
[b:1crbsr9w] Toulouse for Championship in 2017, Super League in 2021! Avignon for Championship in 2021, Super League in 2022! [/b:1crbsr9w]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_18302.png



Licensing has not failed. It is poorly managed clubs which have failed.

If licensing is scrapped there will be no expansion of Super League Europe beyond Britain, and possibly a contraction to the northern heartland. Such a development will guarantee that rugby league in Britain remains chronically underfunded and incapable of competing with Australia and New Zealand national teams, which thrive on the well managed licensing system in Australia.

RankPostsTeam
International Star1743No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2019Aug 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: JEAN CAPDOUZE "Licensing has not failed. It is poorly managed clubs which have failed.

If licensing is scrapped there will be no expansion of Super League Europe beyond Britain, and possibly a contraction to the northern heartland. [sizeSuch a development will guarantee that rugby league in Britain remains chronically underfunded and incapable of competing with Australia and New Zealand national teams[/size, which thrive on the well managed licensing system in Australia.'"


Will having french teams playing in SL make Britain compete with Australia and New Zealand teams any better ?. unless said french team is filled with English players then NO. Why have english players playing in france when they could play in britain if this is your side of the debate. Also RL in britain is already underfunded, ask the SL clubs why the under 20's were scrapped, Saving money.

Also licensing has failed, Poorly managed clubs poorly designed business plans that were laid in front of KPMG to look at should have seen the fundemantal floors and holes in them and judged them accordingly. Unless thebusiness plans themselves were not worth the paper they were written on , then why have the pretence of licensing in the first place, Some stadiums have not been built out of matchsticks yet, let alone bricks and mortor, all part of the licensing scenaria, and Richard lewis clearly stated that if clubs did not stick to thse promises then they could be removed, again, another pretence that the RFL would actually follow through on "their side of the bargain"

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12646
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33809_1522680904.png
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png

Moderator


Quote: JEAN CAPDOUZE "Licensing has not failed. It is poorly managed clubs which have failed.
'"


Granting licences to poorly managed clubs that then go on to fail (tbf in part because they lack the support of wealthy benefactors that back some 'better managed' clubs ), then granting newcos that spring up in their place new licences makes it rather difficult, IMO impossible, to take a significant portion of the licensing criteria/grading system at all seriously. Depending on how widely shared that opinion is, that represents a failure. Can anybody genuinely imagine the clubs providing straight-faced applications covering the same ground as last time, again?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach22777
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2020Feb 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

//www.pngnrlbid.com [quote="bUsTiNyAbALLs":9q9d2t35]Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.[/quote:9q9d2t35] [quote="vastman":9q9d2t35]My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.[/quote:9q9d2t35]:



Quote: Mild Rover "Granting licences to poorly managed clubs that then go on to fail (tbf in part because they lack the support of wealthy benefactors that back some 'better managed' clubs ), then granting newcos that spring up in their place new licences makes it rather difficult, IMO impossible, to take a significant portion of the licensing criteria/grading system at all seriously. Depending on how widely shared that opinion is, that represents a failure. Can anybody genuinely imagine the clubs providing straight-faced applications covering the same ground as last time, again?'"

Licensing never promised to pick 14 perfect clubs. Just the 14 best. Its not inconceivable that those clubs in SL who went bust, were still a better bet than Halifax.

RankPostsTeam
International Star1743No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2019Aug 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: SmokeyTA "Licensing never promised to pick 14 perfect clubs. Just the 14 best. Its not inconceivable that those clubs in SL who went bust, were still a better bet than Halifax.'"


Jbecuase i am a Fax fan does not make me bitter & resentfull. Its history as far as i am concerned, Halifax were just there to make the whole process justifiable to clubs with aspirations for SL. It doesn't change the fact that Licensing has failed very, very early & continues to do so and will do until it is scrapped, Castleford are also in the mire now, their Application was based on a stadium they had promised three years prior. I believe their business plan was based on being in a stadium that didn't exist & still not a brick laid and now not going to be. ( no disrepect to Cas fans, its not a dig)

Seriously you can't say licensing has worked, P & R failed time and time again and would do again if reinstated without having some kind of criterea to have to comply with first. Licensing doesn't work, P & R doesn't work, perhaps a combination of them both would ?. Who knows, only time will tell, but whilst SL chairmen have their noses in the trough and not looking any further down the road, nothing will change and the games will slowly fade further away.

Thats it, i've had my say, the minute smokey turns up, im off, its boring and i would prefer to burn my ballsack on hot coals.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1620
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2014Sep 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
45763_1282658880.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_45763.jpg



They backed themselves into a corner by saying it would be 14 teams in Super League early on, instead of the teams that are up to standard, whether it be 10, 12, 14, 16 or whatever.

I think we'll see promotion and relegation return, but with decent minimum standards that must be achieved to reach Super League.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach22777
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2020Feb 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

//www.pngnrlbid.com [quote="bUsTiNyAbALLs":9q9d2t35]Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.[/quote:9q9d2t35] [quote="vastman":9q9d2t35]My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.[/quote:9q9d2t35]:



Quote: Faxhali "Jbecuase i am a Fax fan does not make me bitter & resentfull. Its history as far as i am concerned, Halifax were just there to make the whole process justifiable to clubs with aspirations for SL. It doesn't change the fact that Licensing has failed very, very early & continues to do so and will do until it is scrapped, Castleford are also in the mire now, their Application was based on a stadium they had promised three years prior. I believe their business plan was based on being in a stadium that didn't exist & still not a brick laid and now not going to be. ( no disrepect to Cas fans, its not a dig)

Seriously you can't say licensing has worked, P & R failed time and time again and would do again if reinstated without having some kind of criterea to have to comply with first. Licensing doesn't work, P & R doesn't work, perhaps a combination of them both would ?. Who knows, only time will tell, but whilst SL chairmen have their noses in the trough and not looking any further down the road, nothing will change and the games will slowly fade further away.'"
In what way would promotion and relegation have avoided or mitigated the issues seen at Bradford or Wakefield, or now, according to you, Cas?
Quote: Faxhali "Thats it, i've had my say, the minute smokey turns up, im off, its boring and i would prefer to burn my ballsack on hot coals.'"
Pics or GTFO

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12646
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33809_1522680904.png
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png

Moderator


Quote: SmokeyTA "Licensing never promised to pick 14 perfect clubs. Just the 14 best. Its not inconceivable that those clubs in SL who went bust, were still a better bet than Halifax.'"


Very possibly, but necessity demanded that decisions be made in an ad hoc and less than rigourous fashion. It basically had to be made up on the hoof - there was nothing in place to help manage a crisis, because the whole point was that checks were supposedly in place to allow us to see them coming and then prevent them.
Perhaps it has all turned out for the best, but either way we've got where we are by compromising the principles of licensing to irrelevance.
But even if they do intend to carry on regardless, while it'd be pointless and damaging IMO, some sort of [iindication[/i that we're doing so would be timely. There's not much to be gained by looking back, beyond one or two obvious lessons, but there's plenty to be lost by not looking forward.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach22777
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2020Feb 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

//www.pngnrlbid.com [quote="bUsTiNyAbALLs":9q9d2t35]Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.[/quote:9q9d2t35] [quote="vastman":9q9d2t35]My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.[/quote:9q9d2t35]:



Im not sure they would need to announce everything is staying the same. Id pretty much assume that until told otherwise.

Saying that I hope there are a few minor changes, certainly the removal of the three year time-frame which benefits no-one. But I don’t think it makes any sense whatsoever to be making major changes right now. The last thing anyone in the game needs is more instability.

I also think that P+R isn’t the default position for the game, if we were to accept this structure as a failure, then P+R would still need to justify itself as the best option, it isn’t just the fallback option we revert to.

Im pretty sure we will see some information coming out soon. Clubs would need a few months to prepare for whatever it is we use going forward if it does change and if it doesnt we will need to know the timetable for bids/decisions.

RankPostsTeam
International Star1002No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2015Feb 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Goochie "They backed themselves into a corner by saying it would be 14 teams in Super League early on, instead of the teams that are up to standard, whether it be 10, 12, 14, 16 or whatever.

I think we'll see promotion and relegation return, but with decent minimum standards that must be achieved to reach Super League.'"

I've never been convinced of centralizing what should be done to make the game more attractive when it comes to grounds. Surely the balance as to whether money is spent on the team or the ground (or marketing, or whatever) at any particular time is best left with the clubs, who have the most accurate knowledge of their own current situation. Sure, plenty will get it wrong, but why any better or worse than some central authority? Of course there needs to be minimum standards for disabled access and safety, etc. but these exist regardless of the RFL, etc. Defenders of licensing (and to a limited extent that includes me) often site the improvement in some grounds, but I don't think that's clear cut - who's to say they wouldn't have happened anyway?

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman4799No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2021Apr 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
Black Backgrounds/Zoot.gif
Freedom for supporters of the government, only for members of one party - however numerous they may be - is no freedom at all. freedom is always and exclusively for one who thinks differently. Rosa Luxemburg, 'Die russiche Revolution'.:Black Backgrounds/Zoot.gif



Talk about a return to some form of P&R is all very well, but personally I doubt whether there's more than Leigh, Halifax, Fev, Sheffield and, in the longer term, Crusaders who are seriously interested in playing in SL. All we're going to end up with is a revival of what Dave Hadfield once christened funny results time towards the end of the season as clubs desperately try to AVOID being promoted.

135 posts in 10 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint
135 posts in 10 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


3.98779296875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
23m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
Recent
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
38s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
39s
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
47s
Rumours thread
Scarlet Pimp
2515
1m
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
1m
2024
Butcher
5
2m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
3m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
3m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
3m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
3m
TV Games - Not Hull
UllFC
3080
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
480
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
533
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1275
England's Women Demolish The W..
1095
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1340
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1130
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1397
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1930
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2148
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2387
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1960
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2197
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2661
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2093
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2165
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M 1,690 80,15514,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
 Thu 6th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Hull FC
v
Leigh
 Fri 7th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Castleford
v
Salford
20:00
St.Helens
v
Hull KR
 Sat 8th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
17:30
Catalans
v
Leeds
 Sun 9th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
17:30
Warrington
v
Wakefield
17:30
Wigan
v
Huddersfield
 Thu 20th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R4
20:00
Salford
v
Huddersfield
 Fri 21st Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R4
20:00
St.Helens
v
Warrington
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington-Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
23m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
Recent
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
38s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
39s
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
47s
Rumours thread
Scarlet Pimp
2515
1m
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
1m
2024
Butcher
5
2m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
3m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
3m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
3m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
3m
TV Games - Not Hull
UllFC
3080
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
480
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
533
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1275
England's Women Demolish The W..
1095
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1340
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1130
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1397
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1930
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2148
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2387
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1960
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2197
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2661
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2093
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2165


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!