Thoughts?

Surprised.

You CANNOT attack the head. Just because its the shoulder and not an elbow or forearm it shouldnt be ignored

Shoulder into face not intentional but deserved imo

Ridiculous and the ref has ignited the game by making a stupid decision.

Good use of the screen by the officials.

High and dangerous but NOT a red.

I completely agree with the decision and hope a shoulder to the head is now punished accordingly and consistantly
Very dangerous.

Totally justified. Contact was deliberate and to the head, and it doesn't matter whether the part of the body that made contact was the arm, leg, head, foot, fist or shoulder. I don't think Moa's a dirty player, but that challenge was dangerous.

Deserved red for me. You can use your shoulder but not into someone's face

Hit him right under the chin and his shoulder was rising all the time. Whether it was pre-meditated or not is another story. Deserved to go as did Tommy Lee last night but bottler Bentham bottled it once again.

Game's going soft. It was a great hit imo and if it happened to a Hull player I'd be saying exactly the same.

So I suppose you thought last nights decision was right too?
Moa may not have meant to do what he did, but it was an attack to the head with the shoulder and deserved a red.

Yea sure you would , you can't attack the head in anyway shoulder or arm, sending off was the correct decision.

End thread.