Quote Bullnorthern="Bullnorthern"
Nigel Wood said in his first interview as Chair that the RFL were following a “ fewer and better” path. He disagreed.
'"
If every club in SL and all aspiring championship clubs had academies what would be the cost of this and how many players would make it to regular Superleague first team.
If the number of clubs were just 10 in total how many of the cream of the young talent in the community game would not bother to follow their ambition if they had to sign for Wakey because Cas didn't have an academy or Wigan because Leigh didn't have an academy.
I've read of many top young players whose dads will drive them miles to go to a top academy rather than the local one. They even cross the M62 to be at the top academies.
Look at the SL squads, they are full of Antipodeans because there are so few quality English lads coming through.
Even academies don't just sign "local" lads they sign the best they can and often dad drives these kids miles to play at the elite academies.
What is the point of having so many lads "making up the numbers"?? If there are less academies but much stronger teams then the lads development will be better.
If everyone had an academy the number of failures would be enormous, if only a small well chose academies were in place the standard would be much higher.
Like it or not it makes sense. Oldham didn't have an academy but Sinfield travelled to Leeds. Didn't the Burgess lads travel to Bradford from Dewsbury?
If your going the be an RL professional you travel to be one, many great young lads will travel to Australia to further their careers John Bateman didn't stick to Bradford all his career because he was born there. Young Aussies have also travelled here to try to get into the game.
Wood has to disagree with the decision or he'd be lambasted by the Bulls fans......But he may secretly he happy that's one less cost blocking Bulls getting back in SL.
