.
I was in favour of re-admitting Toronto but only if they could prove they had the funds. If the owner is only willing to reveal his net worth after they have been voted in that does not inspire confidence. This is a Trump - style move and far too vague.

Very perceptive. Livolsi merely saw an opportunity to lever exposure for his Wolf grooming products in the UK via Superleague. He refused to give proof of funds without a guarantee of an SL place. You can be sure that had SL said yes and Livolsi had come here peddling his appallingly named mens products and failed to sell many, he would have been straight back to Canada,

I disagree with most of that. Why do Fev need to pay players? You can play without having to pay players, flippin heck, most RU clubs around here don't pay players.

"SKY Sports hopes of slashing their Super League contract have been complicated by BT Sport's interest and a possible bidding war. Sky had wanted to trim £10million off their £40m a year deal."

Sounds promising!

Let’s hope BT’s interest is genuine.

Well they had a go with Union (dont know if they still cover that) and BT would suit me just fine

I hope not, as it'll probably mean we'll end up having to pay out for Sky to watch NRL games, and BT for SL (and maybe Championship) games, as they are separate TV deals.

If SL moves to Bt sport then so does my subscription money and so will tens or even 100 thousand plus Subscribers BT maybe realise the worth of selling new subscriptions to RL fans. We will see how it pans out.

The way Sky has treated the sport the past 15 years or so is shambolic. If BT can better their offer then take it I say and stuff Sky.

I think it's more the way that SL Chairmen have sold out the game for TV money is shambolic, and despite thay income the game is in a very sorry state, domestically and internationally.

The games always in a sorry state.