|
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Roy Francis Article |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 295 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2021 | Aug 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
66569_1384981373.png :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_66569.png |
|
| Have to disagree with you there. What it proves is that rugby league looks at talent rather than skin colour, and so it should.
BBC trying to make a woke issue out of something that isn't there. The piece should be about Roy Francis being ahead of his time as a coach, not that he was the first black coach.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1040 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2024 | Feb 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Zuider "Have to disagree with you there. What it proves is that rugby league looks at talent rather than skin colour, and so it should.
BBC trying to make a woke issue out of something that isn't there. The piece should be about Roy Francis being ahead of his time as a coach, not that he was the first black coach.'"
So the fact that Australia still had a colour bar is not an issue. Or how about the South African full back who couldn't accept a black man was not carrying his bags. Jeez the article managed to explain what a great coach he was while at the same time make people aware of the struggles a black man in that era had to go through. The point about Roy Francis hoping his granddaughter looked white so she wouldn't have to go through the trouble he did is very sad.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 238 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2020 | 5 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2021 | Mar 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
78055_1588880919.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_78055.jpg |
|
|
Quote: Zuider "Have to disagree with you there. What it proves is that rugby league looks at talent rather than skin colour, and so it should.
BBC trying to make a woke issue out of something that isn't there. The piece should be about Roy Francis being ahead of his time as a coach, not that he was the first black coach.'"
I disagree with you there, just because RL allowed some black players to be involved in the sport doesn't mean they were ever 'inclusive' or diverse as some have claimed and it was rare for black players to play as it is now. You had to be far and away better than a white man to get a look in, even Francis was forced away from the international scene because of his skin colour so that proves skin colour DID matter in RL!
Black players were employed solely on the basis that it made the chairmen money by winning games and getting bigger crowds through the gates, it was more Northern business savvy than anything to do with acceptance.
At last count there were 25 players who identified as BAME within RL top echelon, in 2000 that was 20, it hardly shouts to a sport being what some people claim it to be. Personally I don't really care how many of whatever background play, there's lots of reasons why people from certain backgrounds might not play or want to participate in x. And if people want to participate and achieve they can, even BAME sportspeople state this. https://www.2wheelchick.cc/2019/01/wome ... is-it.html
But making claims RL was ahead of the game with regards inclusivity because of some 'firsts' is just a whole pile of dung
|
|
Quote: Zuider "Have to disagree with you there. What it proves is that rugby league looks at talent rather than skin colour, and so it should.
BBC trying to make a woke issue out of something that isn't there. The piece should be about Roy Francis being ahead of his time as a coach, not that he was the first black coach.'"
I disagree with you there, just because RL allowed some black players to be involved in the sport doesn't mean they were ever 'inclusive' or diverse as some have claimed and it was rare for black players to play as it is now. You had to be far and away better than a white man to get a look in, even Francis was forced away from the international scene because of his skin colour so that proves skin colour DID matter in RL!
Black players were employed solely on the basis that it made the chairmen money by winning games and getting bigger crowds through the gates, it was more Northern business savvy than anything to do with acceptance.
At last count there were 25 players who identified as BAME within RL top echelon, in 2000 that was 20, it hardly shouts to a sport being what some people claim it to be. Personally I don't really care how many of whatever background play, there's lots of reasons why people from certain backgrounds might not play or want to participate in x. And if people want to participate and achieve they can, even BAME sportspeople state this. https://www.2wheelchick.cc/2019/01/wome ... is-it.html
But making claims RL was ahead of the game with regards inclusivity because of some 'firsts' is just a whole pile of dung
|
|
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1040 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2024 | Feb 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: 48756c6c20 524c4643 "I disagree with you there, just because RL allowed some black players to be involved in the sport doesn't mean they were ever 'inclusive' or diverse as some have claimed and it was rare for black players to play as it is now. You had to be far and away better than a white man to get a look in, even Francis was forced away from the international scene because of his skin colour so that proves skin colour DID matter in RL!
Black players were employed solely on the basis that it made the chairmen money by winning games and getting bigger crowds through the gates, it was more Northern business savvy than anything to do with acceptance.
At last count there were 25 players who identified as BAME within RL top echelon, in 2000 that was 20, it hardly shouts to a sport being what some people claim it to be. Personally I don't really care how many of whatever background play, there's lots of reasons why people from certain backgrounds might not play or want to participate in x. And if people want to participate and achieve they can, even BAME sportspeople state this.
Don't forget how the GB touring party went to apartied South Africa leaving poor Billy Boston to go back home to the UK on his own. That is a stain on rugby league in this country. Once they were informed how Billy Boston would be treated in South Africa the squad and management should have called the whole damn thing off. That example is proof the sport wasn't as inclusive as people claim even though it was miles ahead of other sports in the UK.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 741 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2017 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: 48756c6c20 524c4643 "I disagree with you there, just because RL allowed some black players to be involved in the sport doesn't mean they were ever 'inclusive' or diverse as some have claimed and it was rare for black players to play as it is now. You had to be far and away better than a white man to get a look in, even Francis was forced away from the international scene because of his skin colour so that proves skin colour DID matter in RL!
Black players were employed solely on the basis that it made the chairmen money by winning games and getting bigger crowds through the gates, it was more Northern business savvy than anything to do with acceptance.
At last count there were 25 players who identified as BAME within RL top echelon, in 2000 that was 20, it hardly shouts to a sport being what some people claim it to be. Personally I don't really care how many of whatever background play, there's lots of reasons why people from certain backgrounds might not play or want to participate in x. And if people want to participate and achieve they can, even BAME sportspeople state this.
Exactly. Many a sport can lay claim to having black athletes competing 100 years ago but that doesn't mean they were inclusive. It just means they were good for business.
Boxing had a black world champions in the early 1900's but that was far from a sport that black athletes had equality.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 6734 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2021 | Jun 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3738_1390436317.gif The referee's indecision is final:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3738.gif |
|
| Quote: kobashi "So the fact that Australia still had a colour bar is not an issue. Or how about the South African full back who couldn't accept a black man was not carrying his bags. Jeez the article managed to explain what a great coach he was while at the same time make people aware of the struggles a black man in that era had to go through. The point about Roy Francis hoping his granddaughter looked white so she wouldn't have to go through the trouble he did is very sad.'"
very sad indeed, i don't know if you have seen the excellent iplayer programme on the welsh union players who have gone to league over the years, but in it you can see its not just Australia at that time - the welsh RU did not pick black players either - there's a couple of hard hitting interviews in that programme with one of the former players in tears over it even now, hence the likes of francis, boston and sullivan all coming north to league
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.0830078125:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,504 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|