Yes, because I was referring specifically to our own Test team, and how I personally believe they would be best represented. Essentially that I favour GB+I rather than England, and how I believe the four separate home nations should operate below Test level. I wasn't talking about the whole of international rugby league and eligibility rules!

The only other sport that feels the need to tour as GB is Union. They do so as an "extra" channel to their being. Are you saying that League should treat Scotland, Ireland, Wales and England as 4 feeder countries to 1 Test side, but Tonga, Samoa and Fiji should be allowed test status?
I have to say that's a very odd stance.
GB, NZ, Australia, PNG & France are the only nations that do not rely on heritage teams. We either accept this, or we embrace heritage teams and "pretend' to have an International Game. Which is it, because there is no middle ground!

The Pacific Islands aren't the same as the UK in terms of being four countries in one. In fact I'm not certain, but I don't think anywhere else in the world is like that!

As a country we're in quite a unique position. All Olympic sports compete under the "Team GB" banner, boxers, motorsport drivers, etc are all stated as "British", so it's not just rugby union that uses it. Even the Ryder Cup team was originally GB+I before becoming Europe I think. The cricket team is England and Wales. If RL was played professionally in all four home nations then it would be worth competing separately. It isn't though, so yes, I think each should operate separately as a development side with only one, GB+I, Test side.

Again, I'm only talking about the British Isles teams, not the whole of rugby league, so Tonga and the rest have nothing to do with this.