Quote: Him "That Warrington were deserved winners isn’t in doubt and doesn’t contradict his piece about Hicks not being impartial. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Snap shots that support their views? Do you disagree that McManus has questioned whether Hicks was impartial in that statement?
McManus clearly states that Hicks wasn’t impartial due to him preferring Warrington.
The fact Saints fans are defending this or trying to p words in a clear statement is just as daft as the statement itself.'"
He does not say hicks was not impartial. At any point.
He write about the perception of impartiality.
For me it was the wrong time to write it, he should have saved it for a few weeks. But I also don't disagree about refs not being on twitter. Twitter is a hole for trolls to spout vile abuse. Why would refs go on twitter.
They have to be impartial, so going on twitter is going to make that far more difficult.