Quote: bewareshadows "You miss all the bits about him saying Warrington were deserved winners. That he does not blame hicks. And that his issue is with the rfl.
But people do only take snap shots of the parts that support their views.'"
That Warrington were deserved winners isn’t in doubt and doesn’t contradict his piece about Hicks not being impartial. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Snap shots that support their views? Do you disagree that McManus has questioned whether Hicks was impartial in that statement?
McManus clearly states that Hicks wasn’t impartial due to him preferring Warrington.
The fact Saints fans are defending this or trying to p words in a clear statement is just as daft as the statement itself.