Point of order. It is trolling and trolling of the highest order as it is designed to generate an angry or irate response...it's a wind up and therefore by definition, it it trolling


Indeed...and if Gutterfax ad actually abused someone then he's be right to have been banned, but he didn't. A decision was made to ban him because he was seen as provocative. The fact that nearly all of his predictions regarding the state of the game in the UK and Australia as well as the fate of the London Broncos were spot on is either here nor there. As the owners of the site said at the time, "this isn't a democracy" and I for one am pretty delighted as to what a shambles these boards have become since the senior mods and owners decided that they'd ban him with no warning. The word w-nk-r with @ and 3 used instead of a and e is a minor infraction of the AUP......Gutterfax wasn't banned for life with no warning for a minor infraction....he was banned because the site owners said so! Reaping what they sow is an apt term....

You were comfortably thrashed at Wakefield and St Helens last night despite the "close" scorelines.

Leeds Rhinos 48 Toulouse Olympique 22. And with 3 conversions missed, could have been 54. swings/roundabouts chorleyjean.

Unless a Mod constantly deletes your posts because you question his rumours and have opposite views to him to the point you send abusive posts when your private messages complaining of his behaviour don’t change a thing.

I've question this act of allowing the trolls to take over myself but had posts removed and basically being told to ignore them and shut up as i suspected the mods were in on it, this almost confirms it in that one of them is actually defending them