Bailey refused to give a sample for anti doping testing, which is an offence for which he was charged, but Bailey contested that he believed the water provided at the had been tampered with and a psychiatrist ruled that he was unable to process the information given to him when warned that his refusal was an offence for which he could be banned, meaning he has not been judged as culpable for his refusal. It's all a bit confusing, granted I know little else of the case or of bailey's circumstances of late.

A slight issue over how they originally went about building their coaching team and squad - and an argument about 'morals and ethics' I believe!

You're welcome. Should make for a tasty opening Championship fixture! Thankfully, we hardly have any of our squad left from the Rowley era, so the fixture should be 'civilised'.

Here's hoping we can emulate what HKR did last season. Good luck this time around.