|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1162 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2018 | Apr 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote The Devil's Advocate="The Devil's Advocate"I get that bit, but what about if the ball is still moving?
Many times in the last couple of years I've seen some great kicks into the in-goal diffused by a defending player, by assisting it out of play whilst it's still moving, resulting in a tap twenty, is this still allowed?'"
No. The ball has to touch the floor over the deadball line to be considered dead. if a player touches it before it touches the floor over the deadball line, regardless of where they are stood, then they are deemed to have taken it dead. so that would be a drop out if done by a defender
Do we know if this applies at kick off too? I'm assuming it does
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 3829 | Cronulla Sharks |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2025 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote RedUnderTheBed="RedUnderTheBed"No. The ball has to touch the floor over the deadball line to be considered dead. if a player touches it before it touches the floor over the deadball line, regardless of where they are stood, then they are deemed to have taken it dead. so that would be a drop out if done by a defender
Do we know if this applies at kick off too? I'm assuming it does'"
Thanks for trying to clear it up, however, it states in the article :-
=#0080FFThe previous rule of a player being able to straddle the dead ball line or touch in-goal line and be awarded a 20m restart has now changed.
=#0080FFWhere the ball is stationary in the in-goal area comes into contact with a player in touch, in goal or over the dead ball line, the ball is deemed to have been made dead by that player. The ball must have bounced on the ground either on or over the dead ball line/touch in goal line for a 20m restart to be awarded.
Maybe I'm too pedantic, or maybe the the wording is poor, but why does it state a stationary ball?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4828 | Wigan Warriors |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2015 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I don't think you're too pedantic; the wording is poor. The first sentence seems to give a general overview of the rule. The second paragraph appears to concern itself with only a sub-set of an actually quite rare condition where the bsll happens to be stationary, which casts some doubt on the generality of the first sentence.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 3829 | Cronulla Sharks |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2025 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote moto748="moto748"I don't think you're too pedantic; the wording is poor. The first sentence seems to give a general overview of the rule. The second paragraph appears to concern itself with only a sub-set of an actually quite rare condition where the ball happens to be stationary, which casts some doubt on the generality of the first sentence.'"
Thank you, I thought I was going mad, so many replies, so little clarity.
And the moving ball scenario? (Chuckling to himself)
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 430 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2015 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2017 | Feb 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Goal Line Drop outs
The ball is touch in goal when it touches the corner post, in goal line or any object on or outside the touch in goal line. A player is NOT considered to be an ‘object’.
Where the ball which is stationary in the in-goal area comes into contact with a player in touch in goal or over the dead ball line, the ball is deemed to have been made dead by that player.
The ball must have bounced on the ground either on or over the dead ball line/touch in goal line for a 20m restart to be awarded. Should the non-kicking team touch the ball whilst playing at it before this happens then a drop out will be awarded.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Yep the wording is rubbish. It only clarifies 1 particular situation but not all.
Unfortunately it's not an isolated case in the rules. They could do with both updating (to get rid of archaic rules that don't apply anymore) and re-wording to be more specific.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1606 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2021 | Jan 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote meast="meast"How about a penalty to the defending team when the ball player dives, or cheats to try and win a penalty?
Instead of the ref shouting, "he's playing for it" or "he's diving" penalise them!
This aspect of the game has really spoilt my enjoyment of the game , so much that i don't think i watched half the games that were live on SKY, sort it out please.'"
Completely agree - you hear the ref calling 'milking', in those instances, it should be a penalty every time, and a sin bin for repeat offending.
I just posted the below on a similar thread on the Leeds board about the biggest change (not really a change, just applying the actual rules of the game) if like to see;;
The biggest change I'd like to see is how the ruck is policed. I'd get rid of the 'dominant tackle' interpretation and simply have a set time that the ruck is allowed to last - no advantage for dominant tackles, no advantage for finding your front in attack - just a consistent time for each tackle before held is called, and once the ref calls held, all defenders to release and clear the ruck area immediately.
For me, that's the way we minimise the importance of 'wrestle' and get back to the game being a contest of attacking rugby vs brutal defence, not a matter of who is the best at controlling the ruck.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 40 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 9 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2020 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| only rule that should change and believed they trialled it in pre season a few years ago is a chragedown does not wipe the tackle count, currently it penalizes good defence and rewards poor attack
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 808 | Castleford Tigers |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Aug 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote wolfinwidnes1="wolfinwidnes1"only rule that should change and believed they trialled it in pre season a few years ago is a chragedown does not wipe the tackle count, currently it penalizes good defence and rewards poor attack'"
I've got to agree with that one. Also, I think that the play the ball needs to go back to playing it with the foot, and not just rolling it behind him. This one is maybe just me, but it annoys me on the 20 metre restart when a player taps the ball either a) in the wrong place; or b) with his own players stood in an offside position, and the referee makes them play it again. To me it should be a penalty to the opposition. Offside is offside, regardless, and they all know the rules that there own players have to be behind the 20 for play to commence. I agree with the free play to a degree, but I would like to see it tweeked slightly. ie; as soon as you pass or kick the ball you are deemed to have accepted possession and it's play on from there.
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bentleberry="bentleberry"Goal Line Drop outs
The ball is touch in goal when it touches the corner post, in goal line or any object on or outside the touch in goal line. A player is NOT considered to be an ‘object’.
Where the ball which is stationary in the in-goal area comes into contact with a player in touch in goal or over the dead ball line, the ball is deemed to have been made dead by that player.
The ball must have bounced on the ground either on or over the dead ball line/touch in goal line for a 20m restart to be awarded. Should the non-kicking team touch the ball whilst playing at it before this happens then a drop out will be awarded.'"
So a player catches the ball a yard or two behind the deadball line but before it bounces, that becomes a goal-line drop out?
But if a player leaves that ball to bounce and it goes to a ballboy or touches someone in the crowd he cannot have a quick tap. So we have pretty much just gotten rid of the quick tap from the twenty?
|
|
|
 |
|