I dont see any real point in changing for changing sake, Yes the Aussies have said openenly that all their players will get game time, I dont think thats a luxury we have - We need to use the Scotland game to build on combinations, Therefore I see no point in changing the spine now 1,6,7,9,13 They all need time to play togther.

Therefore my changes are thus

Sarginson out - Percival in. I was actualy suprised Percival didnt get the nod to begin with I actually thought he offered alot in the France game - I know it was only france, but still.

Scott Taylor in for One of the Burgess Twins - I would also Start him and put Hill on the bench

Thats it really

I'm just waiting for the old ''We're never going to beat the aussies until our players can match the intensity of SOO. Bring back yorkshire vs lancashire''

And of course who can forget ''we're never going to beat the aussies until clubs produce more junior players. To do that we need to do away with relegation so clubs can focus on long term development''

Or if P&r isn't in effect see ''we're never going to beat the aussies until we have less meaningless games, half the teams near the bottom have nothing to play for because theres no P&R. Bring back P&r''.

Round we go.

What about a 6 nations? Eng, Aus, NZ, another European team, and 2 of Samoa/Fiji/Tonga/PNG. Probably not necessary to even have a final, so a 5 week tournament.

What about a new idea, which was actually proposed by Phil Gould to solve the NSW halfback problem.
The RFL set up a kind of halfback academy (like football has in France and Germany), where they take the best emerging halfbacks and improve their skill levels at a younger age, and then work with the super league clubs to move them back into the academy system.

Good idea.

Rather see this over a long 7 week tri nations playing each other twice.