Quote: gary numan "Well you don't get a 3d view so there might be a finger underneath it but I agree it was highly likely to hit the line but the fact is no one sees it actually on the line. Under the old system of benefit of the doubt to attackers it's a try all day long but under this system of 'proving' it wasn't you've got to see it touch cleanly.'"
Your problem is , a finger isnt the width of the ball, one blade of grass on or behind the line touches one tiny bit of the ball and its a try.
Its not even a case of benefit of doubt, if that is sent up without the referees input there isnt even a question its given as a try.
The current system fails the very very basics because it is asking the VR to rule on the basis of something other than what he is seeing.