Yes it would be: the most common statement on here regarding Salford (apart from the lie we do not develop young players) is that we have very few fans. It follows we have a small population from which the persons with sufficient wealth would appear.
(Cue comments telling supporters to put in a £1000 each; as usual we're generous with other people's money.)

There's a very good discussion on fan funded clubs here:
www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 960&page=3

If the good Doctor walks, or if any businessman walks, that club is probably toast.

Yes it would be: the most common statement on here regarding Salford (apart from the lie we do not develop young players) is that we have very few fans. It follows we have a small population from which the persons with sufficient wealth would appear.
(Cue comments telling supporters to put in a £1000 each; as usual we're generous with other people's money.)

There's a very good discussion on fan funded clubs here:
www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 960&page=3

If the good Doctor walks, or if any businessman walks, that club is probably toast.

I think you are right.

If the other solutions were so easy to achieve, surely Mr Koukash would never have been needed a few years ago.
Of course, everything is easier in hindsight but, Salfords situation would have been better served had Dr K embraced the sport, instead of
being so abrasive from the start.
I know that when Trinity visited the new ground for the first time, not long after he had taken over, there was a good buzz about the place and lots of families with kids were at the game with a decent crowd (around 7000) and Salford won.

Something changed within a couple of months and you crowds dropped back to 3500ish.
Was this down to the accesibility of the ground or drop in form ?

The work done up to that point had been excellent.

Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?

I think you are right.

If the other solutions were so easy to achieve, surely Mr Koukash would never have been needed a few years ago.
Of course, everything is easier in hindsight but, Salfords situation would have been better served had Dr K embraced the sport, instead of
being so abrasive from the start.
I know that when Trinity visited the new ground for the first time, not long after he had taken over, there was a good buzz about the place and lots of families with kids were at the game with a decent crowd (around 7000) and Salford won.

Something changed within a couple of months and you crowds dropped back to 3500ish.
Was this down to the accesibility of the ground or drop in form ?

The work done up to that point had been excellent.

Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?

"Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?"

I could weep when I compare how Salford does it with how Sale does it:

Sale :
www.salesharks.com/news/4012.php#.V86ylEbLk8k

Salford:
www.reddevilsrugby.co.uk/stadium/

On Friday night, I expect to be still travelling home after midnight. Well after midnight.

"Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?"

I could weep when I compare how Salford does it with how Sale does it:

Sale :
www.salesharks.com/news/4012.php#.V86ylEbLk8k

Salford:
www.reddevilsrugby.co.uk/stadium/

On Friday night, I expect to be still travelling home after midnight. Well after midnight.

Well just take the helicopter then, you'll be home in a jiffy

Well just take the helicopter then, you'll be home in a jiffy