The touch judge had the best view of the first try and he didn't flag him in touch. ref gave a try and there was no video evidence to change that so it should have been given.
second one was not clear either way for me.

Talk about black and white tinted glasses! Clearly in touch on both occasions as the video replays showed.

Unless you've seen different replays to the ones they showed on TV last night then they didn't clearly show anything. Terrible angles used on both.

Which is the point. If the on-field ref sends it upstairs as a try the VR has to have conclusive evidence to overturn. No such evidence was shown.

Well, if you ignore his foot going into touch on both occasions then, no, no evidence was shown

I appreciate that you only having one eye when viewing FC will give you depth perception problems, but no frame of the footage shown last night definitively shows a foot in touch for either try. The angle they showed practically guaranteed that it wouldn't due to foreshortening by the camera lens. There may well be an angle that shows what you claim but it wasn't broadcast last night.

Aye ok then, whatever you say. You know best

Anyway we're getting knocked off the top by Widnes, so we can all pipe down.

Get back to crying about John Boudebza's ban.

On the topic of wingers being in touch, this was given as a try today at the wire hkr match! wtf!

Interesting! Hull FC fans obviously won't see anything wrong with it. #blacknwhiteglasses