IF the ball was deemed to have been kicked out of his hands and IF that had resulted in a penalty, is there an argument for a penalty try and/or sin bin?
Not saying it was (hence the capital ifs), just pondering the letter of the law.

regarding Connor's no try, i thought at the ground it looked a try, but as the screen at our place is anged away from the kilner bank it's hard to see it properly.
however, seeing it back on the replay, i would be disappointed if that had been given against us.

That's what I thought too. Huddersfield player gets hands on the ball, it's then dislodged by a Wigan players foot. If that had been the Wigan players hand doing that rather than his foot I'm pretty sure they'd have given a drop out.

I didn't think the boot made contact with the ball, I felt he missed it completely and kicked the Huddersfield players hand away/off the ball. IMO Huddersfield penalty minimum.

I just don't see how you can penalise a player for attempting to kick a loose ball. It's not like it was well after the Huddersfield player got the ball.
It's the same as a tackle after the ball has been passed in my view. If it's in decent time then it's ok.

absolutely correct. Common sense really but video and endless replays can make anything look bad