Simple question really, the entire team seemed lethargic after the non-test that was the French, so do you look to try and swap things around, or keep the same 17 (barring injuries) as they won in the end, and other players would be undercooked in theory if they were to come in now?

Don't expect to see any changes, we were superb second half after a shaky start and shouldn't disrupt that momentum. Would like to see McGillvary involved but at the same time Burgess was hardly at fault for a quiet game, he hardly got any ball.

well if he is going by the same listing that has John Bateman at 6'2" then probably correct

more realistically 6'3" imo.

He's definitely there or thereabouts.
(He lives just down the road and I've known him since he was young lad).

I too like magilvary (and Briscoe for that matter) and can see the advantages in work rate coming away from line but as alluded to Joe is very dangerous under the high ball in attack and very very solid defensively in same way and his height is a big advantage and something i thought of when the magilvary subject cropped up.
I'm biased I know but Budgie would have been my choice and I'm sure more opportunities will come his way in the next few games however I was surprised they didn't switch hall to the right and Joe left as I think Hall is a better rightie than Joe who I see as predominantly a left sided player.

fair enough.i am just going by how he looks on the pitch however, if u have been up close you are in a far better place to judge. i can confirm Bateman is definitely not even 6 foot though, I've been up close a few times.