Where's the Loose Forward supposed to put his head?

Roby won't be happy.

There won't be room for it next to Eddie Hemmings' anyway.

WTF has happened to the virtual terrace?

Great contribution. Try again.

They trialled 11 a side in under 20s in Australia about 5 years ago.
I went to one of the games, which were held between sides that couldn't make the finals in the last few rounds of the comp.
You really couldn't see much difference in the general play, but a lot of tries were scored because the defence was very stretched.

The good points are that less players in tackles (because the defence is spread thin) means less injuries. Any good attacking moves are generally rewarded with tries, and also, less players would be needed in squads, simply because you only need 15 fit players each week instead of 17.

As I said, it is hard to see a difference in general play - just more breaks happen and more tries are scored.

If you want to see basketball like scores switch to 11 a side. I don't.

thank you roopy.

these pommies on here thinking they know more than me, I come from a place where the oval ball is king not frikin soccur.

Warren Ryan suggested this b4 me, so go and sit on that inglundurs.

"As I said, it is hard to see a difference in general play - just more breaks happen and more tries are scored"
I personally am happen with the balance of the game at the moment, with probably just minor tinkering required.
I don't want to see scores of 98 to 92 etc.

you won't, fine go to 12-a-side, but I want to get rid of "scrums". They're a farce.

Also I want to ban the drop-goal, and instead of a goal line drop-out have a goal-line pass-out (it has to be an under the shoulder pass).

Why are you so keen to reduce the amount of players on a Rugby League pitch?