Quote: PopTart "So, I guess I should reply as I am the Mod.
I'm happy to be questioned, as long as it's done correctly. I've reread my post, and to be honest I'm ok with it.
I would refer the opening poster to my advice in my comment on the thread.
Surely if someone is offended by a post they would prefer the conversation to be stopped rather than taking it to another board to take it up again?
Please feel free to PM me to discuss, or PM administration if you feel you can't.
What I'd prefer you not to do is start name calling again but that's your choice, but I must remind you more firmly not to talk about another poster's identity in any way. That is a strict rule which will have to be enforced by any moderator. It will be on the Wakefield forum.
I'll leave moderation of this thread to the other Mods
It's no big deal and I'm in no way offended but I'd have thought the rugby on show at the moment was a more interesting topic.'"
Just looked back at BLM's post about immigration/refugees (where it states sending them back on a boat) - and what do you know? It ends again with the hunting/shooting emoticon.
I'm assuming these offensive reactions to minority groups are going unchallenged by Wakefield moderators who are quick to lock threads and ridicule opponents to such posts - whilst ensuring they're the ones who get the warnings and reminders about forum rules etc.
Still wondering why I'm presuming 'cahoots' - it's either that or an illustrative signifier of morals and values.
