lol

What is wrong with an owner wanting a return on his investment that he finds acceptable?

You sign a contract with the club, you don't sign a contract with the club as long as you are playing. If this was all the situation the Theo would be completely in the wrong.

The problem with Salford now is Koukash is like the boy who cried wolf - it's always somebody else's fault, he's never to blame.

So when all these stories come out about Salford, it's a natural reaction to assume the Doc has been an idiot again. I wouldn't bet against him being at fault on this too. There are too many rumours of mismanagement for them all to be lies

I'm struggling to think of any situation like either the Puletua, Locke or Fages case to happen to any club, never mind all 3 in the same season.

Let's face it. It's not those 3 players. Its the club that's the problem.

Hasn't a local solicitor claimed to have represented 30 Salford employees in recent months? And if the rumours about the ridiculously complicated system they've devised for paying bonuses and appearance fees are true, it's no surprise that so many players are heading for the exit with a claim for breach of contract.

It is [url=http://www.frontrowlegal.com/our-people/richard-cramer/This Fella[/url local to Leeds who has apparently represented at least 20 former club employees over the past 30 months on their exit from the club.( dated [url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/kevin-locke-resigns-salford-red-947986018th June[/url
( If what Neil Barker writes is to be believed )

It seems the players who have left,represented by Cramer,were of the previous Wilkinson regime and those signed when Noble was in charge - notwithstanding Locke arrived after Iestyn Harris was appointed head coach.

Strangely,no court proceedings or findings have resulted in Dr Koukash being referred to,or deemed as some kind of ogre.Surprising with the number of players leaving/wanting to leave.

I was of the opinion the CEO and head coach sort out the contracts.

Also,Theo Fages was given a 5 yrs contract by the Wilkinson regime a matter of weeks prior to their financial circumstances being described in a church local to Salford;in Pendleton.
In similar circumstances to the one given to Whitehead at Bradford - prior to their first announced financial mess in 2012 or 13.

Posting under another alias now are we gutterfax

Quote BD="BD"Theo Fages has handed in his resignation today, but as expected Salford are disputing this and claiming he's still their employee "until November 2016" What a shambles.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... ts-6213077'" They didn't need him today.

Quote BD="BD"Theo Fages has handed in his resignation today, but as expected Salford are disputing this and claiming he's still their employee "until November 2016" What a shambles.. www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... ts-6213077'" They didn't need him today.

It appears KL lost his RFL tribunal today. Dr K saying he is delighted at the outcome and feels sorry for him, but wishes him the best for future.

Great to read through this thread again from page one and it's uncanny how when situations like this arise the same people make the same mistakes jumping to the wrong conclusions.
Wish they could show some of our officials how to be so consistent.

I too am bemused! A player makes accusations against a club which leads to a 20 page thread slagging that club and chairman. Club and chairman have been proven correct yet no apologies from those on here? No 20 page thread? Kevin Locke has been shown as a liar yer he, his agent, his solicitor and quite a few on here have went quiet rather than say sorry we were wrong!