Quote: JEAN CAPDOUZE "You and the other defenders of Kevin Locke are ignoring the mountains of evidence that the aforementioned Kiwi has been carrying injuries for more than three years, and that this was a major reason why the New Zealand Warriors splurged a small fortune on old spindly legs Samuel Tomkins. The baby faced full back also has a problem with training discipline. Granted he had a distinguished youthful initiation into the NRL, but those glory days are long gone. Kevin Locke is damaged goods.
How appropriate that the Super League club with an archaic 1930s vintage run down stadium should have signed an enfeebled crock in its desperate quest to avoid relegation to the Championship.'"
Do you actually even think about what you are going to say or do you just point your fingers at the keyboard and the complete BS comes rolling from your finger tips?
The club he has signed for are clearly in a bit of bother but are trying there best to avoid the drop. By signing one of the best full backs in the game is a massive plus. Good luck to them.
Just remind me also how many trees your superstar urine supper has pulled up this year. That's right none because he's been just as much of a sick note as Locke.
I assume I'm not the first one to have fallen into this "doylum's" trap?
