Quote Renegade="Renegade"If the reason they didn't give the try is because the referees would fear for their careers after this, bending the rules so Australia make a final - something that happens regularly, then we should scrap all internationals right now. Such corruption would be absurd.
Fortunately I don't believe this. I'm all for neutral referees, but seeing as the Aussies don't give a poop about the international game I doubt it would "ruin their careers".'"
Why then do Australia insist on (And get) Australian referees whenever they feel slightly worried about a game?
There are so many stupid quirks about this weekend. The referees were neutral last week. Australia lost. If they lost again they were out. So the referees were no longer neutral. Not only were they not neutral, they were related, which was absolutely ridiculous and a clear conflict of interests.
The reasoning given to the players was that the ball was moving upwards, that there was effectively no downward pressure because of this. The video evidence they showed over and over again and which is all over the internet shows conclusively that the ball was well sunk into the grass with absolutely no hint of it being on the rise. It was a ridiculously poor decision if it was a genuine decision and the reasoning given suggests they knew that.
If that incident happened in Origin or the NRL, it's given as a try. Plenty of evidence for that on the internet too. England need to kick up a fuss about it.