3) he made several try saving tackles which seem to be overlooked

1 and a half.

Is one and a half an "excellent performance" on your radar?

Or does that only apply to Leeds players who miss 4 tackles?

I heard the commentators say that Hodgson has gone to the NRL? I was baffled by that.

He was anonymous today and I've rarely noticed him in Super League. Solid grafter, but nothing special.

Clark had that one good run for the try and a shocking missed tackle for their try. He's still young though.

We miss Roby and McIlorum at Hooker. They dominate the rook area.

Interested to know why you think that?

What part of his game is missing?

He's literally our best player.

He's a 6/7 playing 1 imo. Always has been. Can get away with it in SL because teams don't put him under pressure enough on the high bombs. I haven't watched his NRL games, but I'd suspect they're targeting him in that area. It's a weakness that he's never fixed.

Errors galore, no impact, rarely won the collusion and failed to create any space out wide. I'd be tempted to start Flanders in the 2nd row net week with Tom Burgess starting at 13 as a 3rd prop.

Dont agree with one word of that but there you go.

He's a Whinos fan who is still annoyed because Carl Ablett wasn't selected at all, Hardaker wasn't at full back, Burrow wasn't favoured ahead of Hodgson and Clark and both Sinfield and Peacock are sadly now internationally retired. England would have won by 50 with that lot playing alongside the solid and excellent Watkins and the World's Best Winger Hall.

I can see why you would disagree with picking Tom Burgess at 13 but I don't see how you could argue the back row weren't rubbish.

Well, the fact that two of them were the games top tacklers and that they only made two errors between them might be an inkling.

Also the fact that many posters had a ridiculous agenda against the back row before hand was an issue that seems to keep on going.