Quote: Major Tom "There's a lot more to defence than tackle percentage decided by opta. Sean O'Loughlin has a similar missed tackle percentage and if anyone calls him a bad defender it's pistols at dawn i'm afraid. What they do is charge up at the ball carrier to stop them in their tracks, this can lead to misses but also oftens stops the other team doing what they intended to do.
McIlorum is great at winning the collision and controlling the ptb, this is very important and isn't show in stats. As people like to point out he hurts the opposition, often legally sometimes illegally but he's more controlled now. He's only been penalised 8 times this season. He also makes great cover tackles, traps people in goal on kick chases, he's basically everywhere in defence.
He's become better in attack as well though. His distribution looks great now.
The main thing is he plays his best in the biggest games, taking on the opposition's biggest best forwards and often winning. His best performances have been in play off games and Grand Finals. Look at the Magic game this year, we were missing O'Loughlin, Farrell, Flower, Clubb, Pettybourne didn't have Joel back yet and McIlorum stood up took it to the Leeds pack dragged them into a fight and won us the game. He was head and shoulders the best player in that game.
Compare that with Clark at Wembley were he got pretty much shown up for me, that's the environment he'll be in for England and I'm not sure he's ready yet.
Having said all that Roby is so good I'm not sure we'll need anyone else. If they're going for an interchange hooker I say start McIlorum bring on Roby but i would be happy to see Roby do the 80. McIlorum should be in the squad ahead of any other hooker though and he will be.'"
O'Loughlin misses vastly fewer tackles (percent) than McIlorum so let's put that to bed.
I do, however, accept that some of McIlorum's missed tackles are 'bounce offs' and that they can sometimes be effective.
Nevertheless, I'd take aim at McIlorum's distribution. He doesn't bend his back, looks incredibly stiff and is consequently slow out of DH - running or passing. Whatever his attributes in defence, it's points we lack in Test matches and McIlorum offers almost zero there. I'd rather we have a clever and unpredictable 9 with 3 big hitters alongside him in the middle unit than 4 big hitters with limited attacking edge out of dummy half. In any case, we'll win the middle unit contest with Burgess, Hill, Graham, etc. and *anybody* at 9 - we usually do - and so another hitman is an unnecessary luxury. Creativity is the difference between two evenly matched Test teams.
I also chuckle at Daryl Clark's status as a big game underachiever based on ... er ... one big game. Even there, I think he's being criticised for his team's performance rather than his own. McIlorum had a chance in a big game in the World Cup and was abysmal.