I watched this for the first time tonight. I found it just OK if i'm being honest.
For large parts it just felt like 4 blokes over talking each other.
Is this the same format for each episode?
Does the panel change?

Is the programme supposed to be 'experts' discussing the finer points of the game?

Not sure whether this has happened in previous shows, but personally I'd like to see a current player and an ex player discussing topical issues.

What's everybody elses take on it?

Rod Studd and Stevo are always usually there with two different guests.

But you're right about the shouting over thing, no one ever gets to finish a point on there because somebody (usually Rod) will shout over their reply even though he's just asked them a question.

Presented by someone like Carney it could be a good watch with not just journalist guests too. Stevo does at times try and get a serious point across but Rod Studd (who I find to be bloody awful and shouldn't be on tv in any capacity) tries drawing out the same cartoon caricature type Stevo that Eddie Hemmings draws out during games.

What I thought from watching that show last year (as I've barely watched this year) is that if Mike Stephenson is allowed to talk naturally he can still be a good voice and opinion on RL......but Sky prefer their hosts to draw 'Stevo' out of him instead and he gets silly, shame really.

Not bad really, considering it's four northern talking heads. I only watch on t'internet.

Yep agree with that. I also think it'd be a lot better and might minimise it being the Rod Studd Show a little if it were an hour long instead of 30 mins.

Guests include Rod Studd, Stevo, Terry O'Connor, Neil Barraclough, Andy Wilson, Chris Irvine, Steve Mascord, Pete Smith, Gareth Walker, Martyn Sadler and Danny Lockwood.

Might be one or two others I've missed.

Can't stand that whining voice of Chris Irvine.