Thought I was the only one who saw that. Looked quite clear that he threw it down to me as well. Annoying for us Salford fans how it led to a try as well, we have been awful going forward tonight though.

Don't particularly like Lockers but Daryl Griffins "accidental" brush on a Wigan players chest with his studs after his confrontation was missed too.

Dire game. To be fair to Wigan you'd think it was Salford who'd have had the short turn around.

Some very poor reffing. Both from Bentham and his TJ's.

The penalty for the rip, that was overruled by the tj, only to be shown as a blatant rip was very very poor indeed.

Missed high tackle at the start by Manfredi and looked like there were a few instances of deliberates knees to the head whilst peeling off tackle from Wigan early on (possibly the TV angle though).

As it goes it hasn't impacted the result, but very poor performance.

Play like life depends on it against leeds.

Bend over against wigan.

Standard.

And the obstruction rule changes again (or the VR's interpretation of it).

Correct.

Smith took the return ball on the inside of the passer and ran round him.

Whether or not you think it was an obstruction, the interpretation ALL SEASON, would have seen that scrubbed off.

lol at this thread,

1. Chase didn't even drop kick it grubberd it.
2. o'loughlin didn't trip chase he was trying to kick the ball back to a Wigan player and he made contact with the ball
3. the obstruction ruling was correct and people who don't understand the difference between a run around and a pass behind a dummy runner really need to wake up.

Good to see that it was the Ref who won the game, never mind.

Where exactly is Taylor (IIRC) meant to teleport to so that he doesn't 'obstruct' the Salford defender?

1 - I agree with that, it looked dubious to me.
2 - he did trip Chase, it will have been his intention to get the ball but he did clatter Chase and should've been a penalty.
3 - I was happy with both the obstruction decisions given tonight and thought the VR was correct with both. It's a poor argument for people say they wouldn't have awarded it earlier in the year (maybe they wouldn't) but does that mean they should continue calling them incorrectly or instead turn things around and use a bit of common sense.