Quote: Gallanteer "This question has two sides to it.
Â
The example in question is not really about refs decisions that do not match his interpretations, as with the speed of the game, these things can and do get missed.
Â
It's more to do with the Video ref that has time and different views in order to make the right decision (or not).
Â
The case in point was in the Rovers vs Hull match on Thursday night.
Â
We have a player tackled over the line with two men in attendance and the ball comes free. After several looks, Eddie Hemmings asks Stuart what he thinks and Mr Cummins says that it look like the ball was stripped and needs to be a penalty to Rovers.
Â
The VR then goes on to give the opposite (and incorrect) decision, and Cummins states that he believes that they have got it wrong.
Â
1. Is it right for Stuart to make these comments and possibly continue to fan the flames of those who believe all the refs in this country are rubbish. It also makes it obvious that they are not training the refs very well.
Â
2. Should he be excluded from stating anything on live TV and therefore avoid further controversy?
Â
3. Sack Ganson over his continued influence in training the refs (a bit tongue in cheek but also with a possible element of truth).
 '"
i think you are wrong to assume that just because the VR disagrees with Cummins, their decision is wrong. It is possible that Cummins and the VR just have a different view of the incident.