The sad thing is it's not a surprise he will get this fine. We all know there is no consistency with the decisions the panels make. All you have to do is look at the example hudgell brought up himself.
I think its great chairmen come out and say things as the RFL don't listen to the fans at all but at least they have to pay some interest in what the chairmen say.
And then fine them for doing so

Well you have done a very good job of exaggerating everything I said and seemed to get the wrong end of the stick.
With me saying “we” I would be surprised if you could find anyone who didn’t agree that those two tackles should have had the same punishment.
I also didn’t make any point for fans to be on the panel for disciplinary. It was in general that the RFL don’t listen to fans on any matters that would affect them.

You didn't read the thread about it then? Plenty disagreed. Like on any given incident.


So your comment is just meaningless, then. And you don't propose any particular mechanism by which the RFL could "listen to the fans" in any particular way.

Can you at least give an example of where the RFL has not "listened to the fans"? I mean, I am asking for just one example. The question isn't loaded, I am just interested in what you mean when you say this, because I can't immediately think of any single instance where a unanimous "fans' voice" has spoken to the RFL but been "not listened to".

He will need a good lawyer. For all that I find myself agreeing with him. Never thought the day would come.

That doesn't mean his aggrievance doesn't need addressing, not that he needs educating in the error of his ways.

It's all good slapping a fine on someone, but if they aren't sure what they've done, or don't believe what they did was wrong, they're gonna do it again!

Nobody seems to know how this system works.

@drmarwānK?

I had to look that up to see if it was a parody account, and I'm still not sure!