|
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Leeds one trick pony |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 400 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2014 | Apr 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
55914_1338730919.jpg [color=#FF0000:r1w65gkc][size=100:r1w65gkc][b:r1w65gkc]Missing Knowsley Road[/b:r1w65gkc][/size:r1w65gkc][/color:r1w65gkc]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_55914.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "Morally it was a knock on all day long.
My understanding (and I can't be arrsed looking it up, but a long time ago I seem to remember doing so) is that this all relates to the kick.
If I am running with the ball then I can drop the ball in a forward motion but if I kick it before it touches the ground, that is legal and it is play on.
But if I just fumble it, and it goes to ground, it is a knock on, and it makes no difference whether it accidentally makes an incidental contact that I didn't intend with my leg on the way down.
If you look up the definitions, I think you will find that the exemption is if a player "KICKS" the ball, which means what it says on the tin. It means a conscious and successful decision to propel the ball somewhere with your leg.
On any natural meaning, or common sense, or anything else, there was never in a million years any "kick" here, the ball by fluke bounced lightly off the leg and the player knew nothing of it and intended none of it. So the accidental contact with the leg does not negate the obvious knock on.
If he'd dropped it, but then seeing it was falling to ground, deliberately had a go at it with his leg, then it would be OK. Because that would count as a "kick".
____________________________
EDIT
Oh, go on then. Just for youAccidental Knock on
If, after knocking-on accidentally, the player
knocking-on .... kicks the ball before it
touches the ground,... then play shall be allowed to proceed.
Definitions means imparting motion to the ball with any part of the
leg (except the heel) from knee to toe inclusive.'"
I think the issue was not whether it was deliberate/accidental or kick/no kick, but rather the fact that it went backwards off his leg, rather than forwards, before it touched the ground. If it had accidentally hit his leg and gone forwards, then that'd still be a knock on, nobody is debating that. But Cummins seemed pretty sure that the fact it hit his leg and went backwards meant that it wasn't a knock on.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8991 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
47035_1386433761.gif We can be bold enough to make a stand and do battle for our views and beliefs. But we must strive to be mature enough not to resort to unnecessary personal attacks upon people with opposing views.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_47035.gif |
|
| I'll admit I am still slightly confused.
If you bobble a ball in your hands, but the final momentum is backwards. Then it's not a knock on (I know FA did the whole it's a knock on but permitted, but can we just assume a knock on is the non-permitted type).
If you juggle the ball and kick it forwards it's not a knock on.
If you drop a ball and kick it as it hits the floor it's not a knock on - drop goal.
If you knock a ball backwards accidentally, then it's not a knock on.
But if you drop a ball forwards and it goes back off a part of your body, you have to prove it was intentional for it to not be a knock on????
You see what I mean, you can fubble a ball backwards and it not be a knock on ie facing your own line.
But if you fubble a ball forwards, then fubble it backwards with the hands it's not a knock on.
But fubble a ball forwards and then fubble it backwards with any other part of the body and intent is called into question.
Seems a bit inconsistent.
I would have thought it would be a fumble forwards, then hitting another player or ground that was the deciding factor, not whether it hits yourself??
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| Quote: Him "..
Silverwood has already made his decision on that instance and play has continued on.'"
well sort of, he obviously wasn't certain and suspected a knock on MAY have occurred, else he wouldn't have asked about it.
You ignore that he KNOWS the referral rule. So if there is a tackle, and play stops, no immediate great dmage is necessarily doen; whereas if there is no tackle and the next thing is a try, it can be checked. And was.
This is not perfect, but i think we all agree that it is far better than when the VR could go back further than the last PTB. The rule has to have a dividing line somewhere and there will always be an artguable consequence, and always hard cases.
Quote: Him ".The stupid thing is if Saints had been tackled then got a quick play the ball and scored it would have been given. Saints were effectively punished for scoring in one play instead of two. '"
So for the reasons stated it was not "stupid", no solution is perfect. I understand your point but would respond that had the try stood, it would have been an injustice. Answer that!
Quote: Him ".Teams are in the strange situation where it might be better to wait and get tackled rather than score a try!'"
You say so, and indeed you are right. So as the players knew what seemed to have happened, as much as any ref, that option was theirs to take, and they chose not to take it. Is that the ref's fault too?
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1091 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Offside Monkey "I think you're right and if the Ref had blown for it, no one would argue. However, the fact that he waves play on and vocally confirmed that he though it was OK is what got my goat.
In the following play, we ended up over the line and hoping for a penalty try, only to be denied by the video ref going all the way back, past the contentious foul on the try line, past checking the offside for the kick, to a decision that the ref had already firmly given. Not only had Silverwood already given it, but there's still a big question mark in many people's minds of the decision, as it did go backwards off the leg.'"
Same thing happened to Leeds last season at magic.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| Leeds can't really ever complain about Magic again, though
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 6838 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
86.jpg Let all the doubters keep doubting and those who believe keep believing.
We’re only interested in those in the bubble. Anyone who wants to come in the bubble, you can come in.
But you’ve got to keep believing.:86.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "Leeds can't really ever complain about Magic again, though
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.43359375:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M +1 | 1,896 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|