|
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Punishment Should Fit the Crime |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 39 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2013 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Jul 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: HKRSid "Refs tend to not like sending players off because they get slated for ruining games.
How about, the offending player has to be substituted and cannot return?
That way the offended team gets some benefit from his actions.'"
Ok I'm going to combine two problems in the game as to why this wouldn't work. On Sunday Bradford had two players in the first half taken from the field injured. Injured enough to not return for the rest of the game. Now say later that game a third man was knocked out but refused to come off the pitch because if he did he wouldn't be allowed to return. He is then subsequently substituted and the coach wouldn't normally let him back on BUT a ref then sends someone off and the coach has no other player to put on in his place other than the player with a head injury.
The game's importance would more often than not come before player safety and for this reason alone should not be considered.
There are question marks about the 'on report' system at the moment, now it is used far more than it should however if an official has not seen the incident or can not get a clear statement from another official at the time then it would be unfair to send off the wrong player or for an incident not worthy of a sending off. On-report can work effectively but a video review system at the time would work best.
People say this is too costly, well HKR have one in the room where the coach sits during games, he can rewind to check what has happened and gives him a clearer indication as to where the players are going wrong...etc so why can't something similar be used with an official on the side lines?
For the time being it doesn't have to be used for try scoring situations, it just has to help find the real perpetrators and see what course of action should be taken. Neil for example used the Kris Welham headbutt. I am in no doubt that he was in the wrong for doing what he did and as many have said it was a red card incident but the opposition player was holding on to his arm and wouldn't let him get a quicker play the ball away. This should have been a penalty for holding down but nothing given. A video footage of this incident could have seen Welham walk but a penalty still given for the first infringement.
Hopefully this statement will ring in the ears at Red Hall and they will change what needs to be changed ASAP.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 28 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2014 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | May 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
71880_1390739303.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_71880.jpg |
|
| How about, graded penalties like in something like ice hockey.
If its worth a yellow straight yellow same for red, not sure if its just a penalty or a sin bin, a new short sin bin, say 2/3 mins.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2014 | Apr 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons3ae4_files/4637-1859san_c-msnicons.jpg :icons3ae4_files/4637-1859san_c-msnicons.jpg |
|
| a 5 minute sin bin if your put on report and any subsequent ban, 1 game is against the team the offense was against, Ie a 3 game ban, miss next 2 games, 3rd game against opponents, whenever you play them again
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 148 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2023 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
31942_1295303598.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_31942.jpg |
|
| Quote: phleastyler "a 5 minute sin bin if your put on report and any subsequent ban, 1 game is against the team the offense was against, Ie a 3 game ban, miss next 2 games, 3rd game against opponents, whenever you play them again'"
But what if said offending player joins a new team before his current team play the offended team? Sorry it doesnt work because of this problem.
Best thing that can happen is an automatic yellow card is given for any offence commited that merits an on report andif the ref is unsure who the offending player is then its automatically the captain (or acting captain if the captain is off the field) who cops the 10 mins. this I think would also get the captains on the pitch really making sure his side are not commiting any foul plays.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9074 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
23603_1336678755.jpg "Look, I'd never use injuries as an excuse..." Daryl Powell:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_23603.jpg |
|
| Quote: Brenio "But what if said offending player joins a new team before his current team play the offended team? Sorry it doesnt work because of this problem.
Best thing that can happen is an automatic yellow card is given for any offence commited that merits an on report andif the ref is unsure who the offending player is then its automatically the captain (or acting captain if the captain is off the field) who cops the 10 mins. this I think would also get the captains on the pitch really making sure his side are not commiting any foul plays.'"
Trouble is, on report occurs when the ref hasn't had a good view (or when he's being a bottle-less get). What happens in the former instance if there hasn't actually been a serious offence committed?
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 4420 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
9387.gif Challenge Cup
1923/24, 1928/29, 1947/48, 1950/51, 1957/58, 1958/59, 1964/65, 1984/85, 1987/88, 1988/89, 1989/90, 1990/91, 1991/92, 1992/93, 1993/94, 1994/95, 2002, 2011, 2013
World Club Challenge
1987/88, 1991/92, 1993/94
Championship/SL
1908/09, 1921/22, 1925/26, 1933/34, 1945/46, 1946/47, 1949/50, 1951/52, 1959/60, 1986/87, 1989/90, 1990/91, 1991/92, 1992/93, 1993/94, 1994/95, 1995, 1998, 2010, 2013
Charity Shield
1985/86, 1987/1988, 1991/92, 1995/96
Regal Trophy
1982/83, 1985/86, 1986/87, 1988/89, 1989/90, 1992/93, 1994/95, 1995/96
Lancashire Cup
1905/06, 1908/09, 1909/10, 1912/13, 1922/23, 1928/29, 1938/39, 1946/47, 1947/48, 1948/49, 1949/50, 1950/51, 1951/52, 1966/67, 1971/72, 1973/74, 1985/86, 1986/87, 1987/88, 1988/89, 1992/93
Lancashire League
1901/02, 1908/09, 1910/11, 1911/12, 1912/13, 1913/14, 1914/15, 1920/21, 1922/23, 1923/24, 1925/26, 1945/46, 1946/47, 1949/50, 1951/52, 1958/59, 1961/62, 1969/70
As Well as other comps that won't fit:9387.gif |
|
| Bring back the biff!
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.203125:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M +1 | 2,058 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|