Cant see why people are knocking the deal, other than the fact that numbers haven't been made public.
Whichever direction you look at this, it is a marked improvement on where we have been for 3 years.
Lets hope that it works well for the new sponsor and that we can progress further next time around.
icons077e_files/5885-54zedonite-msnicons.jpgregards
and ENJOY your sport
Leaguefan
"The Public wants what the Public gets" - Paul Weller:icons077e_files/5885-54zedonite-msnicons.jpg
The REAL challange is whether the deal provides what both the sponsor and SL want out of it.
For one I don't care who sponsors SL, because my interest in SL and F.Ut is minimal and that will apply to an awful lot of people in this country.
It may work for the benefit of both organisations and good if it does.
History, and past experiences, show certain things happen which benefit neither side. For this to work to mutual benefit then both SL and F.Ut will need to implement a hard work ethic to reap the expected rewards. That I know is anathema to some, just take and hope.
66597_1422209762.jpg[i:3hc4f0y3][b:3hc4f0y3][color=#4040FF:3hc4f0y3]William Rankin. Warrington Rugby League Heritage Number 362
70 first team appearances 1930 - 1937.[/color:3hc4f0y3][/b:3hc4f0y3][/i:3hc4f0y3]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_66597.jpg
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
