There are many reasons why I disagree with it such as ST issues and how the whole thing is to be funded but the main one for me is that even though the 2nd tier is to receive an increase in funding in order to close the gap between themselves and the top tier, it is not going to solve the problem of the bottom 4 teams from the top tier being accustomed to playing at a higher and faster standard than the top 4 from the 2nd tier, and I doubt that 7 games is going to be enough for the 2nd tier teams to get up to speed.

It seems they weren't alone reading 70% of the comments on this board

I think it's less of a swing, but very similar to another poll on another site some months ago, when this was proposed.

Again on that thread the nay sayers came in hard and early. But as a few days past, those who wanted to wait and see more detail, after a bit of thought came forward and the 8x8x8 system caught up and in the end took the lead.

Change is difficult for most people. Better the devil you know etc.

So it's quicker and easier to vote no as you just stick to your guns.
Those who are not sure will hold back until they have actually took the information on board.

Does the new money sway anyone else from their original opinion that this can't work???

Doesn't make much difference IMO, the bottom SL clubs will still lose money compared to current fixtures, the championship clubs still won't have the money to be ft and competitive with the bottom clubs and if someone does get promoted they still won't have enough time to build a decent squad.

So IMO not really.

You can make anything work within its limitations... The new sponsorship actually makes it worse in my opinion... The fewer top clubs are becoming less focused on self sufficiency and more greedy for a bigger share of the central fund...

I am a fan of a club that voted for this and I am in violent dissagreemnt with that decision. It is a decision which will ultimately be to the detriment if not downfall, of the sport as a viable professional entity, and does nothing for grass roots development.

This decision is about cutting away those who are perceived to be weak, without a viable approach to developing new and stronger replacements...

Back to the hegemony thread, this is hegemony at its insidious worst.