Don't care who you are, that was a pathetic try to concede.

You know what they say about opinions.

So you are saying the score would have been something like 44-16? The US domestic players lost to Canada this summer and beat them narrowly another time - I think that puts your argument swiftly to bed.

It wasn't a bad game.
USA had periods where they competed with the best in the world, which is all they could hope for.
The format has a lot of good points, but there was always going to be a mismatch for this game, which technically pits the number 1 side against the number 8 side, the widest spread allowed in the entire competition due to the format, but i'd say USA were very lucky to make 8th spot.

The second hallf shows why New Zealand will win the show - Tim Sheens.
He loses a fullback, so brings a specialist half on and puts him at dummy half, pushing the world's best hooker into the back row. Net result Australia totally lose their composure and play a very second rate second half.
I like Cherry-Evans but he's no hooker, and Smith is certainly not a back rower.