Can anyone explain why the current situation with London Broncos doesn't result in them losing their franchise?

No ground
Virtually no coaching staff - no medical staff
No spectators
No financial backing
Approx 1/2 a squad still on the books
Rumours of wage arrears of 2 months+ to some players that are out of contract/leaving

How much evidence does the RFL need to strip them of their franchise licence?

My Bad

Still, Harlequins RL were "sponsored" by Sports Café and Workplace Systems long after IL was told to leave the club by the RFL, so I would counter he has had something to do with development, given it was his cash that set up and funded the academy that has started to churn out SL players (notice I didn't say SL standard)

Are they still in SL next year then? :\

I'm not against the RFL helping out any clubs when they can. It is however a little two faced and hypocritical to claim membership of SLE and abrogate the Sky funds and refuse to share ANY with non SL members but when falling on hard times get out the begging bowl for assistance from he very organisation they refused to share with when pigging at the trough of Sky and SL.

As well as being massively financially hit when 1. Being booted out of the original Sl and 2 and 3 being forced into relegation twice when not in a relegation spot.