Quote: Him "No it wasn't William.'"
Yes it was Big Rob.
Quote: Him "It was asking if you agreed that the refereeing was inconsistent.'"
No it wasn't. It was a loaded question which contained the presupposition that the Briers incident had been treated in an inconsistent manner in comparison to other incidents of a similar nature. Your loaded question was therefore rejected on the basis of being unreasonable given that other players have been treated in exactly the same fashion for similar misdemeanours.
Quote: Him "You could easily have answered no if you wished. Your reluctance to answer the question is very strange.'"
I'm not interested in furthering your agenda that Briers should have been sin binned on the erroneous basis of you considering it a cheap shot from behind... when photographic evidence proves it was nothing of the kind.