Like anything in life, things take time. I for one think licensing is starting to fruition and show that we have an exciting league with more and more British players starting to come through the ranks; shows in my hometown teams teamsheet against Hull FC last week.

It's also showing in that we're not getting the out and out clear victories that we once had. We seem to be getting more and more shock results by the week, including Cas vs Wigan tonight.

The salary cap is another issue entirely but without licensing would Huddersfield have pushed onto where they are now? Would Widnes be playing as well as they are? Plenty more to say on the subject but i'll leave it at that for now.

No-one has voted yet and the proposal was that unpopular the split has moved to an end of season promotion competition which still may not end up being implemented.

The Dual Reg thing is the RFL trying to make SL more like NRL. In the NRL if you need match practice, you get thrown into the lower comp. The RFL were/are trying to emulate the NRL by using the lower league sides to the SL sides advantage for getting players fit or for players out of form.

We need to to reduce the amount of games. The problem with money is because of the current economic climate. Once that improves, so will the finances of the clubs and the RFL.

The RFL need to stick with licensing and only consider bringing more teams in when it can be proven that the competition sustain them and they can sustain themselves. Pick the most viable 12 clubs, put them in SL and keep it that way until the competition can sustain more clubs.

P&R had it's chance before and during SL era and it was a failure. Why do we need to bring it back? Licensing is only in it's infancy and needs to be persevered with. If we change now, I can guarantee within 5 years time, we'll find something else wrong and want to change the structure again. We need to give ideas time to bed in and grow not give up on them if they aren't an instant success.

We are trying to get all clubs to invest in youth and the seeds of that are starting to come to fruition at most clubs. By bringing back P&R, clubs are going to put more emphasis and money on staying in the top league rather than their youth structures which in turn will weaken the international game even more so than it is now.

Except when it's seen on TV. Then it appears colourful, vibrant and, most importantly, pretty full. As does Wakey's similarly decrepit ground. The contrast with the likes of Hudds is very apparent and even Wigan and Saints can look pretty dead at certain games. So perhaps less of a turn off than might at first seem the case.

That figure quoted for Wakefield is for the City only. Wakefield's population is 325,600 but if we get rid of the likes of Cas and Feath etc it's about 240k.

I don't think there is anything worse than massive empty stands on TV, which is what we get when teams are playing in shiney new stadiums but can only fill 20% of the capacity.