Quote: Ganson's Optician "Sky Sports is a huge organisation. When they first started out people said the concept of paying for satellite/cable TV on top of the license fee would never work, yet here we are today with people paying out ludicrous amounts for Sky +/HD/3D/Sports/Movies/multiroom etc etc. When Eddie first started working for Sky RL was one of the only sports they had and over the past 23 years they have popularised the sport and played a big part in bringing about summer RL, play offs etc. We have the second most watched sport on Sky, with 35% of viewers living down south and plenty elsewhere. If Eddie and Stevo made such insulting television would that be the case?
Please do share with us your experience presenting live television? I am intrigued.'"
See the answer above, I have nothing to prove to the likes of you...frankly from your limited response you just wouldn't get it in any case..
So if you've nothing to add in terms of how good or poor they are, you failed to enlighten us how they are as commentators in your own opinion, is that because you're so limited you don't have a position on that but can only jibe at posters who dare to say they are better at something than another human being..
You're just another whom can't put together an arguement one way or the other and have to lower yourself..congratulations
I'd hazard a fair portion of people could do better, Eddie & Stevo are poor & always have been, they've got progressively worse to the point it is a real put off for many fans.
HTH