People laugh and make light of the "Stevo bingo" but his and Eddie's (to a degree) commentating is so monotonous.

We need up-to date presenters/commentators who can give a real insight into the game and actually call the game how it is not just the same old "chip over the top" "got to get the message out" etc.

I do think Stuart Cummings has added something though. Tonight the referee missed a ball steal, Eddie proceeded to say something along the lines of "they're 50/50 calls aren't they Stuart?" Cummings then went on to fairly reasonably explain why that particular ball steal may have been missed but in the main get picked up by either the referee or a touchjudge. Eddie's reply "as I said a 50/50 call".

Time for change. They've served the game and SKY well but time to move on, fresher approach needed.

He's confused. Is he a mentally ill?

Around the 56th minute mark carney was championing chase as a potential MoM for his performance in the game so far and stevo said ''you're right there Brian''.

Maybe, just maybe, dear old Stevo gets a wee bit carried away at times. Describing him as mentally ill is a bit low to be honest.

I didn't describe him as mentally ill.

they are both brilliant.

I generally find them mildly irritating but tolerable EXCEPT when I'm watching a game involving my own team. All rational thought goes out of the window then, and I mute the sound and listen to the radio.

Classic comment on Twitter last week: Listening to Stuart Cummings explain a decision to Stevo is like listening to somebody explaining Facebook to your Nan