FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Gareth Hock end of the road |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1269 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2015 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
40663_1282761027.png Back the bid - not back it until the going gets tough. WTID:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_40663.png |
|
| I think we will appeal this one. I was at the game and like stated previously, by both sets of fans, nobody seen anything.
He is un controllable at times and a real hot head but I think they've really targeted the player and not the decision here.
He's a class act, full of surprises, both good and bad but he Definately has that game changing ability that can help England beat Australia. His ability to offload a ball is second to none, Definately up there with the best in superleague, if not the best.
He last ban swearing at the referee was stupid on hocks behalf but this ban shouldn't even be considered. Absolute joke which has left his team mates fuming by all accounts.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| Exactly. "The contact was unnecessary and avoidable." That's the finding, deal with it.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10530 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
18919_1341147656.jpg [quote="King Monkey":30st820n]Maybe a spell in prison would do Graham good.
At least he'd lose his virginity.[/quote:30st820n]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_18919.jpg |
|
| If he's fit and playing well he's still a class player, we don't have that many of those to choose from so to say it's the end of the road for him at test level is a bit ridiculous to me.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 2874 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
8762_1295775855.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_8762.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "Exactly. "The contact was unnecessary and avoidable." That's the finding, deal with it.'"
So, this ruling is basically saying that if a referee gets himself badly positioned in the defensive line then a player should not try to tackle the opponent in case he makes contact with the referee in the process. Fair enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
973_1515165968.gif Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif |
|
| Quote: Derwent "So, this ruling is basically saying that if a referee gets himself badly positioned in the defensive line then a player should not try to tackle the opponent in case he makes contact with the referee in the process. '"
No. It isn't saying that, at all.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1269 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2015 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
40663_1282761027.png Back the bid - not back it until the going gets tough. WTID:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_40663.png |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "No. It isn't saying that, at all.'"
He didn't threaten the ref, didn't throw him to the floor or use any aggressive actions towards him. The ref himself wasn't bothered and hock gets four games. It's rugby league for gods sake, get a grip and let it go.
If sinfield/tomkins/wellins got four games for the same thing there would be so many people defending the player however because hocks got this passed which admitadly he has, people say "same old same old"
|
|
|
|
|
|