London (and expansion in general) has got to be a long-term project.

Think you embarrassed yourself by calling Wigan an embarrassment to the sport, so your point about attendances became a little lost.

How is it? Care to refute the post with something sensible or have you nothing but hot air as usual?
Was not the hotbed of rugby league that is Wigan's attendances much lower than pretty much all other 1st division teams bar probably York & Whitehaven(off the top of my head)? That after a successful return to the top flight.
The talk about the miners strike having an effect didn't manage to diminish the numbers elsewhere in huge droves compartatively eg Fev, Cas, Leigh etc during the same time period.

the call of the OP (and others previously) saying London should be kicked out from SL due to attendances, if that is the case then why weren't teams of yore binned off for the same thing. That isn't the rules is it...
yes London is a major problem atm, yes it needs to do shed loads more, yes the RFL need to pull their finger out to help sort it as we need a top flight London team
Should they be binned due to attendances (as posted for the umpteenth time this and last year)..no. That's my point.
Crack on....

London and long term - ideal mates.

So what's long term? Over 30 years so far.

That really is an awful argument!

What were the comparative attendances at other clubs?

What's Salford, Fev and the rest of them using as there excuse? They have 70 years on the Broncos

How long would you like??

The same as the rest to get it wrong

London is a city of 8 million whilst Featherstone is a village of 12000. Fev currently average 2000 roughly 18 percent of its population. Now go do the math for London and then tell me why fev need an excuse silly person.

How long have Fev been in existence? If London are named Twickenham instead would that then make the crowds ok?