Quote: Chris Dalton "On paper I could see the point of the advantage rule. In practise it doesn't really work. You essentially get a free tackle where you can go for broke and then if you don't score a try off it the referee pulls the play back 50 metres. It's odd. I think it worked better as it was. Nice try but the old way resulted in a more natural progression of play.'"
Like others, I can see the point of the new advantage interpretation - and I like it too!
The going back down the pitch to form a scrum at the point of the original infringement can look a bit odd but, in a [isome[/i cases, that will be a good indicator of how hard a team has tried to take their advantage (and hopefully provided some additional excitement through the change in pace).
I'd adjust the rule so that if the ref needs to go back to the original infringement, the scrum is formed at the place where the team taking advantage last had possession of the ball. So it might be at the point the ball was kicked away, because a defender got to the ball first. Or it would be the last place they had ball in hand.